Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
261–270 of 637 posts
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#262https://abc.xyz/investor/news/releases/2019/1203/ Slightly more organized info in the intro bullets. Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the CEO and President, respectively, of Alphabet, have decided to leave these roles. They will continue their involvement as co-founders, shareholders and members of Alphabet’s Board of Directors.
I'm curious what their continued involvement will look like. For a while after Bill Gates stepped down as CEO, there was this awkward tension where Steve Balmer was CEO, but people still treated Bill like he was the one in control -- because he was.
Money goes up. Hell flows down. No need to complicate business.
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#263Seems like “interesting“ timing given that the Alphabet board just recently stated they’re investigating the handling of sexual misconduct by executives: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/06/technology/google-sexual-... And relatedly: > Charlie Ayers: Sergey’s the Google playboy. He was known for getting his fingers caught in the cookie jar with employees that worked for the company in the masseuse room. He got around.…
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is something that I kind of admire about Bill Gates: As Microsoft's boss he was ruthless, and even anti-competitive, all to benefit his own company. But somehow, he is one of the "best type of person" that could become the richest man in our world. There are so many rich people that just look to be buried with their millions or pass it to their family. Hopefully Sergei and Larry will try to get the same type of…
So Gates is not alone. Buffet and Ellison have both pledged the vast majority of their wealth to the Gates Foundation. Somewhat unique to the US, our billionaires tends to be fairly philanthropic.
US billionaires are only philantropic because they don't want to end up either dead or stripped off of all their assets when there is any kind of revolution - no matter if a "real" revolution or an elected one, e.g. if Warren or Sanders win in 2020.
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you are misreading it, I am not judging Sergei and Larry negatively.... What I am saying is that their decision makes total sense, and there is no reason to chide on them on 'why they are not dealing with the employe' problems, but quitting' as the OP did. Really, this is just a: Peace out guys, we are moving on... And there is nothing wrong with it, as google is not really dealing with an existential threat…
I judge them pretty negatively. People like Bezos, Jobs, or even Gates never really spent so much time building this PR image of being for the greater good, holier-than-though, "making the world a better place." Everyone knows "don't be evil", but how about their recruiting catch phrase "do cool things that matter." Even the "not a conventional company" tag line is relevant here. Hypocrites just irk me more than peop…
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#266Seems like “interesting“ timing given that the Alphabet board just recently stated they’re investigating the handling of sexual misconduct by executives: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/06/technology/google-sexual-... And relatedly: > Charlie Ayers: Sergey’s the Google playboy. He was known for getting his fingers caught in the cookie jar with employees that worked for the company in the masseuse room. He got around.…
That's years old news.
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#267A well deserved congratulations to Sundar's promotion! Larry and Sergey have spent the majority of their time on Other Bets for quite some time now, and it's good to see that this is finally being solidified / recognized within Alphabet's management structure.
So now the CEO of "Other Bets" is also the CEO of the main bet... so what's even the point of separating the companies other than the tax dodge? oh, right.
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#268Weirdly this feels like a non-issue. Google has not felt like it has a "personality" for some time - maybe it's a function of hitting mega-corporate size, but it also feels a bit like when Microsoft (a Computer on every Desktop) essentially achieved its goal, it then spent a decade in "goalless and soulless exploitation" mode - something that one suspects is the next step for the worlds largest personality-free platf…
Ironically, they could find some focus by no longer being a one size fits all search engine, and instead offer different search products for different types of users, or focused on different types of information. They do to an extent with travel data, financial data, scholar, but their product just isnt great at crawling the web anymore. They, like Apple and Microsoft, also need some consumer experience advocates, wh…
Or just fixing the search engine that they do have. It really has become shockingly poor.
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is something that I kind of admire about Bill Gates: As Microsoft's boss he was ruthless, and even anti-competitive, all to benefit his own company. But somehow, he is one of the "best type of person" that could become the richest man in our world. There are so many rich people that just look to be buried with their millions or pass it to their family. Hopefully Sergei and Larry will try to get the same type of…
So Gates is not alone. Buffet and Ellison have both pledged the vast majority of their wealth to the Gates Foundation. Somewhat unique to the US, our billionaires tends to be fairly philanthropic.
Re: Sundar will be the CEO of both Google and Alphabet
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like the idea of the "don't be evil" rule, but it always seemed overly naive / simplistic to me. Even without factoring in self-justifying rationalizations, people can have significantly different ideas of what counts as evil.
"Don't be evil" is perfect because of how simple it is. It's supposed to be common sense. > people can have significantly different ideas of what counts as evil. And those people, who need someone to explain to them what is or isn't evil, aren't welcome. That's why I personally loved that motto. Too bad that whole ethos got dropped like it was a recently-launched product.
If you too find it interesting, you may enjoy doing a literature search on the topic.