I know it's against the rules to tell people to read the article, but I would encourage everyone to read the article. It specifically says this is a potential threat to > "elected officials, candidates, political campaigns, [and] political parties" not to the general public. The potential threat is for someone at Candidate_1's campaign taking selfies with the app, that then uploads them to Russian servers where the R…
>The potential threat is for someone at Candidate_1's campaign taking selfies with the app, that then uploads them to Russian servers where the Russian government can see them and can also see what's in the background (sensitive documents?) good old days just less than 20 years ago back at Sun when we were strictly instructed that the computer monitors must be off when the photos would be taken. How times and basic n…
The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
91–100 of 136 posts
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's certainly better than giving your face to sketchy apps from Russia or China.
It's not better to have your face or other data in a database within reach of your own government. Your government has power over you, other governments do not.
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#93I know it's against the rules to tell people to read the article, but I would encourage everyone to read the article. It specifically says this is a potential threat to > "elected officials, candidates, political campaigns, [and] political parties" not to the general public. The potential threat is for someone at Candidate_1's campaign taking selfies with the app, that then uploads them to Russian servers where the R…
It's not against the rules at all, so thank you for the encouragement! I will go read the article.
What the guidelines warn against is something different: Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#94Russian laws obligates all companies and individuals to provide government access to any data, hardware or applications upon initial request or better have backdoor. All information must be stored for minimum 5 years and provided in un-encrypted form or decryption mechanisms must be supplied.
0-10 how naive are you?
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#95Looks like the FBI designated FaceApp as a threat because of its crazy data policy and its Russian origin. Even though I think it's a really shady app, that's a pretty low bar.
Not during an election year, at a point in time that sees _much_ heavier use of these apps than even 4 years ago, no.
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#96The best measure would be for “good actors” (universities, government research agencies, the New York Times) to provide a free FaceApp-type app. It’s like a weekend-hackathon of work and can be prioritized by the app stores.
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#97I know it's against the rules to tell people to read the article, but I would encourage everyone to read the article. It specifically says this is a potential threat to > "elected officials, candidates, political campaigns, [and] political parties" not to the general public. The potential threat is for someone at Candidate_1's campaign taking selfies with the app, that then uploads them to Russian servers where the R…
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The potential threat is for someone at Candidate_1's campaign taking selfies with the app, that then uploads them to Russian servers where the Russian government can see them and can also see what's in the background (sensitive documents?) good old days just less than 20 years ago back at Sun when we were strictly instructed that the computer monitors must be off when the photos would be taken. How times and basic n…
This really does not look like a photo of a monitor. Looks instead much more like the original photo?
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#99I know it's against the rules to tell people to read the article, but I would encourage everyone to read the article. It specifically says this is a potential threat to > "elected officials, candidates, political campaigns, [and] political parties" not to the general public. The potential threat is for someone at Candidate_1's campaign taking selfies with the app, that then uploads them to Russian servers where the R…
Can apps still get information that identifies the specific device? If so, another possible threat model could be more about identifying who uses what device rather than anything specifically in the photos themselves. For example, I already have a database of high value target's faces built from political sources like house.gov. Now I do facial recognition between that set of faces and the FaceApp faces. That allows…
Re: The FBI considers FaceApp to be a potential counterintelligence threat [pdf]
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
The threat model is that this photo is shared with the Russian government and then the Russian government can match American citizens (or potentially people working in intelligence), and then using that in facial recognition programs. I.e. they can differentiate Americans (insert x country) from their own citizens and know who to watch more carefully. This is a legitimate threat model. I'm not sure why you think it w…
A picture, that has no good associated data about the user, is a real threat? Heaven forbid Russia figures out how to take pictures in public places