OP here, we believe that the time has come to let remote workers and highly agile teams get stuff done together in a very different and much more natural way. CoScreen is a remote collaboration tool that enables exactly that. Problem: Pretty much anyone who has ever worked remotely knows it - today’s remote collaboration solutions provide much better screensharing quality and reliability (thanks, Zoom) compared to a…
i'd like to use this in a classroom setting where either every participant, or the moderator/teacher can see all shared windows but decide to feature only one or two of them. one way to do that would be the ability to minimize shared windows. the teacher (or anyone with moderator privileges) would be allowed to minimize windows, but also have a way to look at windows while minimized (as a teacher i want to see what e…
Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
181–188 of 188 posts
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#182OP here, we believe that the time has come to let remote workers and highly agile teams get stuff done together in a very different and much more natural way. CoScreen is a remote collaboration tool that enables exactly that. Problem: Pretty much anyone who has ever worked remotely knows it - today’s remote collaboration solutions provide much better screensharing quality and reliability (thanks, Zoom) compared to a…
Not even remote. As a nontech worker its unbelievably helpful in a shared office too. I used to have a big screen tv and 2 keyboards and wireless mice at a coffee table in my office for just this problem, and a crazy (for normal humans) hdmi splitting setup that allowed for a byod of sorts. Great idea!
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
The intro video on the homepage shows the actual software in action at around 53 seconds (mouse over the video to unveil the seek bar).
So you have to wait until 2/3 of the way through the video to see the actual software.
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly, here's the direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHI5-ne2F2I&feature=youtu.be...
My initial reaction was, “no, there was no video on that page,” so I went back to look. A lot of browsers disable audio on auto play videos. The fact that the controls are also hidden and the background color being the same as the website, it just looks like an animation, not a video. So some icons move but the meat of the video doesn’t start until after people will have disengaged.
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#185Can I replace teamviewer with this? Their pricing is too expensive.
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
We're capturing them natively and are working on another major performance improvement which should make it at least as efficient as other major solutions.
Are there other solutions that capture multiple windows at once? I’m only familiar with typical screensharing where the use case is either full screen or a single window. The way I understand you, coscreen captures each window shown individually. Doesn’t that also mean that overlapping windows are captured in full? I can’t try it out atm so perhaps if you could leave a comment on cpu usage for encoding as well as ban…
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#187Excellent idea, brilliantly executed. But as a CTO, I would be concerned about the security implications. It makes sense to route traffic via a central server because P2P does not scale to large numbers of participants (which is why things like the Jitsi Videobridge exist despite WebRTC P2P being a thing), but it means your customers have to trust you not to get hacked, be compelled to, or otherwise misplace/record s…
Re: Show HN: Coscreen.co – a radically different remote collaboration tool
#188I wanted to know what this is but was not able to read the text because somebody had the idea that text on a website should be extremely thin and low contrast. The idea of making your text as hard as possible to read is a very bad one.