So unless you're hiding bags of gold underneath your bed as "saving" then that money is going to circulate across the economy naturally as investment. But it is sort of weird that any single person/group can fully know what is best for all individual actors in an economy (not possible).
Lastly, to say that a currency losing 99% of its value over time is not damaging to a household is either ignorance or corruption. The lower tiers of society furthest away from the money printer are the ones that are impacted the most. Coincidentally, I'm going to assume you want to help these tiers the most but end up hurting them.
There is something called the Cantillon effect, where those closest (banks, those connected to the gov) to the "stream" of money get benefited while those furthest away (regular people) get hurt.