I appreciate their commitment to the bit. I wish their team included slightly more diversity however.
If your comment is based on diversity of gender, it seems to run afoul of several "diversity" tenets I was just taught:
- It infers their physical gender based on their appearance.
- It conflates physical gender with gender identity.
- It infers race based on physical appearance.
- It infers ethnicity based on apparent race.
- If brings up the topic of those particular persons' races, ethnicities, physical gender, and perhaps gender identities, when you can't be sure they want them to be discussed.
I'm not trying to be snarky with this comment. I genuinely don't understand what it is that the diversity-advocating crowd is advocating regarding acceptable discussion.