Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

imgz.org

221–230 of 254 posts

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> clearly stating [...] I don't think #1 and #2 are of interest to users, all the users care about is when they type "imgz.org/myimage.png" the image loads. #3 should be rather clear from the fact that you have to pay, hopefully. > This humor reminds me of a 20yo me in college, a time when my sense of narcissism was way outperforming my sense of good taste. Thank you, that's exactly what I was going for!

That kind of humor and response is off putting to me as a potential customer. It gives me the impression that either this website is a bit of joke, or that it's not really meant for people like me (that don't 'get' that kind of humor). That's fine if that's what you're going for, it's up to you. But FYI you'll lose some customers over it, maybe more than you'd gain.

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#222
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAIK the dedicated servers (at least the "server grade" ones with ecc ram) are all now "un-metered 1 gbps". If you get/buy 10gbps uplink, there's a quota again 20TB included (which is lifted if you commit to paying 1 euro/pr TB over). They basically increased the included bandwidth to the point where it was hard to hit the limits om 1gpbs uplink (although 1 gbps maxed out 24/7 is theoretically 10 TB/day 300/month).…

Can you post a link? I don't see the uplink addon on their wiki, and I'm a bit confused as to how there's no bandwidth limitation if there's a data cap (I guess they mean speed).

It's basically in all the "details" pages via the site menu > dedicated (and contrary to what I said, not limited to "enterprise"/ecc ram servers). See for example:

https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/ex42-nvme

Ed: i think the implication is that you can just go ahead and use 300tb/month on a 1 gbps port if you can stand doing that... But that 3 000 TB/month on a 10gbps uplink is not included...

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#223
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you post a link? I don't see the uplink addon on their wiki, and I'm a bit confused as to how there's no bandwidth limitation if there's a data cap (I guess they mean speed).

It's basically in all the "details" pages via the site menu > dedicated (and contrary to what I said, not limited to "enterprise"/ecc ram servers). See for example: https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/ex42-nvme Ed: i think the implication is that you can just go ahead and use 300tb/month on a 1 gbps port if you can stand doing that... But that 3 000 TB/month on a 10gbps uplink is not included ...

I did file a support ticket asking about this a month or so ago, they told me that there's really 1 Gbps guaranteed bandwidth and I could use 300 TB/mo. I didn't know about the update so I didn't ask, but I have just filed another issue asking about that.

I'll be honest, looking at those servers, I kind of want one of my projects to succeed (i.e. make more than $50/mo) so I can rent one of them.

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#224
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you post a link? I don't see the uplink addon on their wiki, and I'm a bit confused as to how there's no bandwidth limitation if there's a data cap (I guess they mean speed).

It's basically in all the "details" pages via the site menu > dedicated (and contrary to what I said, not limited to "enterprise"/ecc ram servers). See for example: https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/ex42-nvme Ed: i think the implication is that you can just go ahead and use 300tb/month on a 1 gbps port if you can stand doing that... But that 3 000 TB/month on a 10gbps uplink is not included ...

This is because of 95th percentile spikes most likely.

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#225
post #145

I remember the day that Imgur launched on Reddit. The post title was something almost exactly like this. At the time it was a revolution, every other photo upload site was shady or slow or expensive or some combination of the above. ~10 years later and Imgur is basically a social network itself. I hate seeing an imgur link now. Photo upload doesn't seem to be something that can be offered in a way that pleases everyo…

> ~10 years later and Imgur is basically a social network itself. I hate seeing an imgur link now. Photo upload doesn't seem to be something that can be offered in a way that pleases everyone. It seems like it can start out good. But then, inevitably, some “product owner” or UX designer won’t be able to keep his or her hands off it, and will eventually ruin it with chat, social features, newsletter subscriptions, Jav…

In the case of imgur, I think the problem was financial.

Running an image hosting site for you to share memes or screenshots with a couple friends is cheap. But becoming the primary method of posting images to reddit gets extremely expensive fast!

Imgur had to expand. They had to become more. They also had to discourage being only used as a direct image linking site, as they needed a way to serve ads.

The alternative was to go bankrupt.

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#226

I've seen your other projects from years ago, e.g. your bookmarks site. I think you have great ideas and skill. I appreciate the effort towards being no bullshit. May I suggest a no-BS approach that replaces highly subjective humor with a copy that focuses on (hopefully also no-bullshit) aspects like 1. clearly stating how you gonna scale image delivery 2. clearly stating how you store files 3. clearly stating how yo…

You're suggesting turning it into a bullshit image host.

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#227
post #97
post #52

I found the "Money" page ( https://imgz.org/money/ )'s marketing style extremely distasteful and offensive. I understand the author is trying to be cool and all, but this is too much by piling up vulgar words all over, IMO.

This is for you: https://imgz.org/money-safe/

i just furrying love you

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#228
post #99

>CHEAPASS: $5 Per Year. 1 GB What does 1 GB mean? Is that bandwidth or storage? And if it's bandwidth, what happens if I go over that amount?

It's storage.

What happens when my 1 MB image gets a million hits from reddit and I consume a terabyte of data transfer?

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#229
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Hetzner gives me 3 TB of bandwidth per month, so I expect that to last me a long time. Oh summer child... one meme going viral on reddit is going to destroy your hopes for the future...

:(

Seriously though.

If an image gets to the front page of /r/all, it can easily get a million hits. That half megabyte image will consume half a terabyte of data transfer.

Re: Show HN: I made a no-bullshit image host

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's storage.

What happens when my 1 MB image gets a million hits from reddit and I consume a terabyte of data transfer?

If you do that often, you'll get an email from me so we can figure out what to do about your bandwidth-hungry successes.
Post reply on HN