Live data from Hacker News

In defense of 'flicks' (or how I learned to stop worrying and love 705600000)

mux.com

1–10 of 66 posts

Re: In defense of 'flicks' (or how I learned to stop worrying and love 705600000)

#5
post #4

The article's leap year rules seem wrong. Pretty sure year 2000 did have a leap day, but 1900 didn't.

>Every 4 years, we get an extra day at the end of February, unless the year is divisible by 400 (there was no leap day in the year 2000).

The article has it backwards. Years divisible by 400 get leap days, others divisible by 100 do not.

Re: In defense of 'flicks' (or how I learned to stop worrying and love 705600000)

#7
post #4

The article's leap year rules seem wrong. Pretty sure year 2000 did have a leap day, but 1900 didn't.

Yep. The algorithm is: there is a leap day for every year divisible by 4, unless the year is also divisible by 100. But if the year is divisible by 400, then there is a still leap day.

Re: In defense of 'flicks' (or how I learned to stop worrying and love 705600000)

#10
post #8

Good article, with a couple of minor errors: "Audio recorded at 44100khz" should be 44.100 kHz or 44100 Hz. "there was no leap day in the year 2000" - false. 2000 is divisible by both 400 and 100, so it was a leap year.

fixed, thank you!
Post reply on HN