Question : is racket still useful if you plan on building a DSL not based on lisp syntax ?
Racket v7.5
21–25 of 25 posts
Here's an example of building a BASIC interpreter in Racket: https://beautifulracket.com/basic/intro.html
Re: Racket v7.5
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
fwiw https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
Note that several of these benchmarks use 4 cores on Python but only one on Racket. Time to revisit the Racket programs and use places. Look at the single core benchmarks to get a more 1-1 comparison.
> Time to revisit the Racket programs and use places.
Please contribute improved programs:
https://salsa.debian.org/benchmarksgame-team/benchmarksgame/...
Re: Racket v7.5
#23I like DrRacket's debugger but i can only run it once on a large program! Even if i increase the memory i can only run it once. The second run results in strange behavior. Does anyone else have problems with DrRacket?
Re: Racket v7.5
#24Any news on the status of “Racket 2” planning? That announcement demotivated me to want to invest in Racket. Is racket-without-sexprs still the plan for mainline mindshare?
The project is now called Rhombus, not Racket2. A project plan was posted on the Racket mailing list about 6 weeks ago: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/racket-users/rhom...
Re: Racket v7.5
#25Question : is racket still useful if you plan on building a DSL not based on lisp syntax ?
I'm currently creating a SQL dialect with Racket. It's great!