Live data from Hacker News

Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

dataviper.io

121–130 of 440 posts

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#121
post #4

Yet another Elasticsearch server wide open. This is going to make the flurry of open mongodb servers look trivial.

Not sure about Google Cloud, but Elasticsearch on AWS doesn't support x-pack security. You can only secure your instance via IP restriction, otherwise you have to sign your requests, which is not always supported on Elasticsearch DSL libraries that are commonly used.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#122
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Haha, when I was a kid and scared to use my real name for things, for some reason I used my email... which had my real name in it, to open a Github account with a fake name So the api knows me as the famous architect, Art Vandelay

There is a way to get every developer’s email on github thanks to git commits adding it :))

In your github account you can add a new email address that doesn't even exist or have a valid TLD, like "name@mail.fake". Don't use it as your primary email and it won't require confirmation. You can now set your git user.email to this fake address and any commits you make will be attributed to your account without exposing your actual email address.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#123

This is why I lie about my birthdate by a couple of days on anything where it's not something like a medical record or where I am required to tell the truth for whatever reason. I also never provide my social security number unless it is required by law.

One of my coworkers generates a fake middle name for every service they sign up with. According to him, this serves as a unique identifier allowing them to determine when a service is selling their data to a third party (or data is being leaked).

Fastmail has subdomain addressing, so if your email is jondoe@example.com, you can use hn@jondoe.example.com to sign up for HN.

That way you'll know for sure who leaks your data, and nobody's going to strip it away like some services would strip away plus addressing (as in, johndoe+hn@example.com).

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#124
post #17

Out of curiosity how do you guys think they managed to scrape LinkedIn on such a large scale? I've been wanting to do some social graph experimentation on it (small scale - say 1000 people near me) but concluded I probably couldn't scrape enough via raw scraping without freaking out their anti-scraping. (And API is a non-starter since that basically says everything is verboten).

I scraped 10 million records from linkedin a few years ago from a single ip by using their search function. I got a list of the top 1000 first names and top 1000 last names and wrote a script to query all combinations and scrape the results.

This may or may not still work.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#125
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually had a similar thing happen with facebook, though we didnt share names.

For a while, our Comcast billing account accessed some other person’s account. Comcast didn’t take it seriously, and just told us to create a new account and not use the old one. (!!!) We had full access. I could have signed this person up for the most expensive package, or even canceled their service.

Let's be realistic here. Everyone knows it's not possible to cancel Comcast service.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure there are search engines for it too but I noticed that credit karma can tell you which of your passwords have been associated with your email addresses in data breaches. Credit Karma is free but the CEO appears to be transparent in how they make money (recommending financial products to you based on what they see in your credit profile).

I am a very suspicious and wary internet user, hardly sign up for any services, but been using Credit Karma for my taxes and light financial monitoring for the last 3 years. Tax Filing was totally free and I got the tax refunds I was expecting. No issues with them whatsoever. I have never gotten any email or other spam as a result of using their service. I am a happy customer, though technically speaking I have never…

I agree. At first I got a few emails over a long period of time recommending financial products (credit cards, savings accounts, etc) but I unsubscribed and haven't seen any of those since. The only emails I get now are when something changes on my credit profile (new account, closed account, etc).

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#127
post #86
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

LinkedIn Sales Navigator is a paid tool which allows you to search their whole database. Then depending on how much you pay you can get all their personal details (Email address, phone number, even their address sometimes.) https://business.linkedin.com/sales-solutions/sales-navigato...

I've always been a little confused how this works. If I got all that info for free, it's a "data leak", but if I pay to get the same detailed personal information it's... In either case my personal data is given away without my consent, but there's this implication that it's only an issue when someone doesn't pay for it.

You're right, my take on this is that a company scraped a bunch of publicly available information, that people left open (consciously or not.) That's why only a subset have phone numbers. The profile URLs, emails, most people don't even try to protect those.

Normally the company sells this data, but now they've given it away. It's not good this data got out because the curation has some value to spammers or whoever. But using the word "leak" here undermines the severity of a real leak where passwords and social security numbers are exposed. Data that was never meant by anyone to be open.

Everyone likely has (technically) provided consent for every piece of information here being shared with partners. Buried in fine print that it wasn't really expected they'd read, of course. It's the cost of being online, and that sucks, but it seems only a leak of what had already been given out.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#128
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a way to get every developer’s email on github thanks to git commits adding it :))

In your github account you can add a new email address that doesn't even exist or have a valid TLD, like "name@mail.fake". Don't use it as your primary email and it won't require confirmation. You can now set your git user.email to this fake address and any commits you make will be attributed to your account without exposing your actual email address.

You can use yourgithubusername@users.noreply.github.com instead of adding a fake email, and your commits will still show up on your contribution graph and be linked to your username.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is that you often can’t find access to the actual “password” used in the breach. Does anyone know where I can see if it was an actual password or just some made up thing?

There was no password on the original ES instance it was open to the web.

I meant my password.

Re: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

#130
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It appears to also contain information possibly acquired from other companies. For example, the author notes that he had attributed to him a phone number he had assigned to him by AT&T that he never used or shared.

Guarantee the fine print in the AT&T contract authorized them to share information with a third party.

Back in the day (maybe it is still this way) your landline was default "listed" and you had to pay a monthly fee to be an unlisted number. So AT&T most likely listed his number in some kind of phone book / directory.
Post reply on HN