Did Slack ship a buggier version of this yesterday? I have it on one of my workspaces, and it's fine . I can still type `backticks` in the editor, with the exact same combinations of keystrokes I used before, it's just that they render as they will on the channel, rather than showing me the backticks (and only when I type the closing backtick. GIF here: https://i.imgur.com/o3wPWN0.gif ) Triple backtick does the same,…
Many edge cases are different. To name one: You realize after finishing your code block that the first two lines of it actually shouldn't have been part of the code block, but should have been normal text above. Go ahead and try to make this change with the new system. Compare that to what you would have done with the old, plain-text system.
Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
831–840 of 1001 posts
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#832Earlier quoted context omitted.
I expressed my discontent to them as well and just received this reply: "I'm afraid there is no way to disable this at the moment, and it's not in the roadmap to roll back on this feature. That said, we're still in the initial stages here, so our focus right now is listening to feedback as we consider certain changes for improvement as we move forward. You've raised some fair points here, so I've shared your feedback…
So their rollout methodology here was to go live with beta software, on production servers, to paying customers, and force them to find the bugs. Brilliant!
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#833Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really unsure why I was downvoted for this. I posted a link to someone else in this thread that has actually talked to Slack employees, it's directly related to the comment I replied to.
Probably for the same reason people downvote when the same comment is copy-pasted all over a thread; I don't need to be linked to somewhere else in the same conversation. I especially don't need to be linked to somewhere else in the conversation that _I have already read because it is higher ranked_. Also possibly: following an opaquish link to find yourself on the very same page is annoying, and kind of the opposite…
In the future how do you suggest I handle this?
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#834Did Slack ship a buggier version of this yesterday? I have it on one of my workspaces, and it's fine . I can still type `backticks` in the editor, with the exact same combinations of keystrokes I used before, it's just that they render as they will on the channel, rather than showing me the backticks (and only when I type the closing backtick. GIF here: https://i.imgur.com/o3wPWN0.gif ) Triple backtick does the same,…
I use the website, and for our workspace I am not seeing the auto-formatting at all now. It appears to be like it was before they rolled out the wysiwyg. Yay I guess. I did not like it at all so I'm happy about it.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#835I use the website for Slack, and it appears to have been rolled back.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#836We could stand this new editor (even though it’s annoying), but what really drives us nuts are the performance issues on mobile, that there’s no way on iOS to see a screen share or to share the screen and that Slack is not integrated into the iOS call system. And when you have the pleasure to use it on mobile, it always tells you that the connection is bad
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#837Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#838In their defence (not the defence of the WYSIWYG box itself) - they quite likely have done lots of user testing that has shown clear desirability, improved value to user, improved usability, etc etc. You have to remember Slack's target persona is probably no longer the Engineer (If it ever was) - it's more likely a much less tech-savvy employee who finds WYSIWYG editors very handy to create rich text inputs. I guess…
> they quite likely have done lots of user testing that has shown clear desirability, improved value to user, improved usability I have never worked at a company that did user testing or if they did it was always done in a way or interpreted in a way to back up the designer's opinion. I don't think I've once in my entire 40 yr career seen a designer test with users, find out something was bad, and change their design…
We did the whole bit: Hired a special company that had rooms with one-way mirrors so you could watch the users use the thing.
It was brutal.
One person went to this really cool subpage, and we were all so excited to see what they were going to do. User waved the mouse around for a few seconds and then clicked back. We were jumping up and down in our seats, just losing it. Our special thing was so cool (we thought) and this person literally couldn't begin to understand what it even was.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#839Did Slack ship a buggier version of this yesterday? I have it on one of my workspaces, and it's fine . I can still type `backticks` in the editor, with the exact same combinations of keystrokes I used before, it's just that they render as they will on the channel, rather than showing me the backticks (and only when I type the closing backtick. GIF here: https://i.imgur.com/o3wPWN0.gif ) Triple backtick does the same,…
Many edge cases are different. To name one: You realize after finishing your code block that the first two lines of it actually shouldn't have been part of the code block, but should have been normal text above. Go ahead and try to make this change with the new system. Compare that to what you would have done with the old, plain-text system.
* move the cursor to 0,0
* hold shift and hit down-arrow twice to highlight the first two lines
* continue holding shift and hit left-arrow once to deselect the EOL on the second line
* use the keyboard shortcut for toggling code blocks (cmd-alt-shift-c)
awkward, but it works. :shrug:EDIT: formatting
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#840Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem with that is Slack no longer needs a small segment of vocal users. They used to, but now they're a huge established company with plenty of service contracts across tons of industries.
That's true, but it can change. Just as tech users were vocal about getting people in, they can be vocal about getting people out.