111–120 of 139 posts
Great concept! Teaching yourself things is always difficult because you only see things horizontally and don't know how to actually build on what you know, especially without spending 000s of dollars.
Wow, that's a lot of dollars
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except Android/iOS, everything you listed is dead or dying. No sane person would pick anything but Electron for a desktop app today, unless you are in a particularly high performance domain (CAD/Graphics/Video/...)
If they don't have any respect for their users I guess.
I would say exactly the opposite, not using web-tech for GUIs is disrespecting the users, because the end result is an ugly app with a lot of missing features (gif/image/emoji support for example).
Users seem to love their VS Code/Discord apps written in Electron. I wonder why.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mobile is “not just like desktop” unless you’re using a cross platform framework and even then you have different constraints - unreliable network connections, different screen sizes and interactions, you have to be more mindful of power and memory usage, dealing with app stores and review processes, etc. But its really not hard to look at job boards or where the money is going both from internal and external investm…
A tablet with keyboard is a desktop. A laptop with wireless connectivity is a desktop. Anything with a pluggable keyboard and screen is a desktop. Something that many fail to grasp.
Hey guys, I am the person behind this website. Please know that it is still in progress. I wanted the initial version out so it is just the "roadmap" images for now. However, I am working on making these roadmaps more accessible for the beginners and easier to contribute to. In the list of things planned for the coming week is the textual version for each with different sections (job-ready, intermediate, advanced, ov…
Instead of learning JavaScript frameworks, isn't it better to advise people to learn and master JavaScript itself? I feel learning HTTP, HTTPS, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript inside-out will benefit someone than to try to learn a framework that will disappear very soon. When you know undelying technologies, it is easier to learn new frameworks because they will always be based on underlying technologies.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What exactly qualifies as a web technology? Isn't anything on an IP address a web technology?
Web != internet. HTTP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, etc are web technologies. TCP/IP (among other things) are internet technologies. Web tech builds upon internet tech.
These lists are so depressing. Is there any other career where people are expected to know 100 things just to be an employee at the bottom of the food chain? I won't be surprised if it is harder to be a Full Stack Developer than to be a CEO of a multi-national corporation. Looks like we are pushing everything to Developers. Developers of the future are going to need a fulltime pyschologist to cope with this ever incr…
Just for example, Devops engineer lists Mesos, emacs, sockets, and virtualization. Other than know that these concepts exist and a 5 sentence description of what they do, you don’t need to intimately understand them. I haven’t gone through the other roles but I’m sure they’re the same.
I think I don't understand these. They seem too high level to actually be useful. There's a old Steve Martin skit from the 70s where he's says he's going to tell you "How to get a million dollars and never pay taxes...... Step 1: Get a million dollars ...". These roadmaps seem about that level. Am I missing it? Are these actually useful? For example clicking backend the first thing is it lists 14 languages (although…
I partially agree. The backend map seems really wishy-washy. The front end map seems much more useful, just because it's more limited in scope. It would be better I feel with in depth tutorials for every step, or links to them, with achievable goals at every step, kind of like a testable curriculum.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doctors, lawyers, and real engineers at least have similar or more broad domains they must be experts in, or people die. CEO is a hard role not because of domain area but because of risk and uncertainty, both of which tend to be low when you're "at the bottom of the food chain."
All doctors, lawyers and real engineers I know only focus on one aspect. They are specialists. I know lawyers who specialises in rape cases, conveyancing, ligitation, but I have never met a lwayer who is expected to solve a rape case today and register a bond tomorrow. Same with doctors. They specialise and only focus on one domain. I was talking about skills when I included CEO, not about risk. When there is lots of…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t doubt that. But, if they advertise a need for “front end developers”, that would strongly imply web developers. I would definitely be surprised if they advertised a position for a “front end developer”, I applied and during the interview they asked questions about Windows Forms development.
Be prepared to be surprised then.
These lists are so depressing. Is there any other career where people are expected to know 100 things just to be an employee at the bottom of the food chain? I won't be surprised if it is harder to be a Full Stack Developer than to be a CEO of a multi-national corporation. Looks like we are pushing everything to Developers. Developers of the future are going to need a fulltime pyschologist to cope with this ever incr…
I don't think these are really excessive. You could probably learn much of each stack by essentially using personal projects as excuses to use these technologies and touch at least half or one third of each list each go. For example, "write a poker card playing website that saves your hand when you press a button" will get you a bunch of frontend, backend, and database.