Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
361–370 of 1001 posts
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#362Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#363While I agree that non-technical persons would not get Markdown, not a single non-technical person ever messaged me something with markup. So why not just disable the shitty WYSIWYG and make markdown-formatting a opt-in choice from the sender of messages?
Also: Even Azure Dev Ops suffered from the same problem. I have no idea, how the same company can produce VS (Code or full version) and then release junk like this.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#364The funny thing is that I am sure most of the people who work at slack know it's terrible, but no one asks them. There is a small cohort of product managers who probably have a plausible-sounding reason to do it, and they need to do something to justify their jobs, so they alienate everybody else because no one stops them. I am, to put it lightly, familiar with this in other companies.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21590153
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#365https://twitter.com/krudolph9/status/1197180483185995776?s=2...
Here is a link to a reddit post. Please tell them this is obnoxious https://www.reddit.com/r/Slack/comments/dmyn45/does_anyone_k...
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#366I still maintain that JIRA has the worst WYSIWYG and syntax highlighting support, of any major code platform. It amazes me they are so dominant among developers.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#367Slack’s old formatting syntax was Markdown-like but not exactly Markdown, just similar. In case anyone from Slack is paying attention to their technical users here, this is a great opportunity to move to CommonMark formatting for technical users and wysiwyg for non-technical users: just make this optional and switch the format syntax for the non-wysiwyg mode to CommonMark. I can understand that changing the formattin…
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#368Earlier quoted context omitted.
what would you say are the top few out there now? looking to adopt an editor for a large website
Recently integrated Quill into our app and it is fantastic — as fantastic as a WYSIWYG editor can be, I suppose. It produces valid, sensical HTML as the output, in case you need to take the result and use it in email templates (which was our use case). Highly recommend.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know what else has a terrible WYSIWYG editor? Microsoft Teams. It's kind of sort of like Markdown, except when it isn't, or when it breaks. At least it's a step up from Lync.
Sounds like Atlassians approach with Jira - "it supports markdown, except when it doesn't!"
So, markdown?
Every website has its own flavor of it. Just reading some of the answers around here you can read "to do markdown better we made our own markdown".
Maybe because it is shitty. Just let users use HTML.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#370At the risk of sounding like a shill, I'd like to shill Zulip. We started using it instead of Slack, and it has been amazing . It's fast, everything is designed to help you get to conversations quickly, keyboard accessibility is second to none and the streams is a much better default than rooms. I can't recommend it enough, it's well worth the money even though they have a nice free tier and are OSS so you can self-h…
That import chats from Slack feature is compelling, damn. So Zulip doesn't hide chats over a certain amount like Slack does eh? This could make it extremely useful for cash strapped non-profits.
Since you mentioned nonprofits, we provide free hosting for open source projects and free or highly discounted hosting (e.g. 15% price) for many other nonprofits.
See https://zulipchat.com/for/open-source/ for more details.