Fuck slack. They're hostile to user choice and preferences, pushing a one-size-fits all attitude. Communication preferences are extremely personal and must be respected. I have a custom ssl proxy to intercept slack.com and modify their api, eliminating what I believe to be dark patterns. Some things I do: * Force dark mode always * Disable favicon.ico updating when there are notifications in DnD * Group channels base…
Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
301–310 of 1001 posts
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#302This is funny because I work across the street of Slack’s office in Vancouver, Canada and two Slack engineers who I frequently chat with during our daily commute already told me they —and a handful of other employees— hate the WYSIWYG input box too, but were afraid to express their feelings because their role is irrelevant compared to the people who made the decision to ship it.
Glad my only use is a comms channel for my Ingress group.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#303Questions I ask myself about this: - Why is this not an “opt-in” feature? I could see it being useful for people not acquainted with markdown-like syntax
- What PM / UX’er thought this was a great idea? I’m sure there was internal feedback that this was less than ideal
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#304Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#305I've been suffering from this one too so I'll share the most annoying part for me. I frequently have reasons to type out glob patterns generally in backticks. The interface for this is completely broken in the new WYSIWYG editor. Here's what happens when I try to type: `/ / `, things work normally up until the second " " at which point the "/" between them becomes gets bolded, which makes no sense, because you can't…
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#306Slack’s old formatting syntax was Markdown-like but not exactly Markdown, just similar. In case anyone from Slack is paying attention to their technical users here, this is a great opportunity to move to CommonMark formatting for technical users and wysiwyg for non-technical users: just make this optional and switch the format syntax for the non-wysiwyg mode to CommonMark. I can understand that changing the formattin…
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how to create two adjacent but separate code blocks. ``` one ``` ``` two ``` I've tried and tried.
If you add a blank line between them, then it won't combine them.
Still...I could have swore I had tried that anyway. Huh.
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#308Here is a link for some additional context https://slack.com/help/articles/202288908-format-your-messag... And https://api.slack.com/changelog/2019-09-what-they-see-is-wha...
Re: Slack’s new WYSIWYG input box is terrible
#309The funny thing is that I am sure most of the people who work at slack know it's terrible, but no one asks them. There is a small cohort of product managers who probably have a plausible-sounding reason to do it, and they need to do something to justify their jobs, so they alienate everybody else because no one stops them. I am, to put it lightly, familiar with this in other companies.
I bet a large percentage of Slack people _tried super hard_ to stop that cohort of PMs. However, you can only fight upwards so much before you just check out completely, cash the checks, and halfheartedly build whatever nonsense they're forcing through.