Lots of people saying that Apple doesn't owe him any explanation, and that telling people why they're banned is just going to prompt "yes, but..." arguments in response. I've dealt with humans, so I'm sympathetic to that... and I've also been caught up by false-positives, so I can see how it can go horribly wrong. I feel that what's being missed here is that Apple, per Rambo, explicitly said they'd get back in touch…
The person seems to be flagrantly defaming Apple, in tantrum fashion, because the person violated Apple rules and got scolded?