11–20 of 146 posts
Are we sure this is not donation match?
Edit: A closer reading seems to indicate these groups may not be enemies.
I wonder how many of the targets take the bait and "sign up for privacy" just to never sign out again, giving Google official approval for their data collection mechanics...
I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that a wide array of problems (from privacy to creating a sustainable economy) might just be served best by heavily regulating the whole advertising sector (starting from banning individualized ads to enforcing quotas on ad-spending/marketing in all other industries)
Are we sure this is not donation match?
FUD / message control / obfuscation is the name of the game.
Non-profits should be automatically named 's - that would at least make it a little more obvious whose message you're getting.
This quote from the article highlights the problem at hand: > Organizations like the Center for Democracy and Technology, which received at least $960,000 from [Google and Facebook] in 2018, are often quoted in the media as unbiased third parties and influence how policy is developed in Washington as such, despite receiving the tech company funding. > The group supports allowing tech giants to sell user data to third…
LUL
This quote from the article highlights the problem at hand: > Organizations like the Center for Democracy and Technology, which received at least $960,000 from [Google and Facebook] in 2018, are often quoted in the media as unbiased third parties and influence how policy is developed in Washington as such, despite receiving the tech company funding. > The group supports allowing tech giants to sell user data to third…