Back in the day this was said all the time at the office. Things change!
Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
21–30 of 163 posts
Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#22Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
My uneducated guess would be to make reverse engineering exploits from patches harder.
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me since we're talking about EOL software that won't receive patches in the first place. I can't think of any good reason to get rid of that besides maybe "we're revamping the website and can't be bothered to port that bit".
Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#24Now if I was an AMD exec I'd suddenly announce that "all versions of all our drivers for all hardware on all platforms will be available forever".
Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#25Why are they doing this?
Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#26Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#27Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#28Then again I remember arguing with a VP that storage is cheap and email size limits are draconian enough already. She was not pleased.
Maybe it is really just about the budget.
Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#29I almost wonder if archive.org could get involved here, as these sorts of things (specifically including graphics drivers) will be a prerequisite for some forms of digital preservation and retrocomputing.
See https://www.archiveteam.org - they've done such things before, and they do post their work to the IA. And yes, this is something where they should be involved.
Re: Intel desktop board BIOS update end-of-life
#30This will lead to people downloading potentially infected drivers from unofficial sites.
But "potentially infected" is mostly paranoia scaremongering, unless you deliberately go for the ad-encrusted huge-flashing-download-buttons sites(and probably even those are OK) --- there's plenty of other community-based sites (like the one linked here) which I've used before for various software, and I'd say a lot of times I trust the community even more than "official" sources. Especially when the latter has commercial interests to uphold.