Parsing Malformed JSON
peteris.rocks
Parsing Malformed JSON
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#2It also sounds much better than "Paring Malformed XML" ;)
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#3Well, live and learn.
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#4Something that would never happen with XML, because it has a grammar. But yes, it's associated with enterprise software and that is bad by definition, right? Well, live and learn.
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#5Something that would never happen with XML, because it has a grammar. But yes, it's associated with enterprise software and that is bad by definition, right? Well, live and learn.
I can ship malformed XML too just like some person shipped malformed JSON. Maybe I forget to XML encode my text or something. Your XML parser would choke on it and you might be making this same exact post.
I don’t have care about JSON vs XML but let us not spread the lie that this cannot happen with XML. It happens all of the time.
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#6Something that would never happen with XML, because it has a grammar. But yes, it's associated with enterprise software and that is bad by definition, right? Well, live and learn.
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#7Something that would never happen with XML, because it has a grammar. But yes, it's associated with enterprise software and that is bad by definition, right? Well, live and learn.
Malformed XML is everywhere. Especially in enterprise environments. And there's a reason web browsers have an extremely detailed spec on how to parse malformed XML.
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#8Something that would never happen with XML, because it has a grammar. But yes, it's associated with enterprise software and that is bad by definition, right? Well, live and learn.
JSON has a grammar too. That is why they had to make a malformed JSON parser. I can ship malformed XML too just like some person shipped malformed JSON. Maybe I forget to XML encode my text or something. Your XML parser would choke on it and you might be making this same exact post. I don’t have care about JSON vs XML but let us not spread the lie that this cannot happen with XML. It happens all of the time.
JSON types match the basic object model of many dynamic languages; not just JavaScript, but also Python and to a lesser extent Lua and PHP. So when people want to generate JSON, they usually do it the 'proper' way: by constructing a native structure consisting of built-in dictionaries and lists in their language of choice and then serialising it to a string. This always generates valid JSON syntax; the worst risk is that an empty dictionary could be mis-serialised as an empty array or vice versa, in languages that don't distinguish the two.
XML has no such easy support; when you generate XML, the least-effort solution is to use sprintf (or an equivalent), which creates the hazard of the programmer forgetting to escape syntax-significant characters (and let's not forget binary/text confusion in some languages).
JavaScript had to evolve E4X and JSX to solve the interpolation problem with XML. It didn't have to create any new syntax to support JSON; it is purely a library feature.
Of course, some programming languages favour neither, like C or Java.
Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#9Re: Parsing Malformed JSON
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Malformed XML is everywhere. Especially in enterprise environments. And there's a reason web browsers have an extremely detailed spec on how to parse malformed XML.
Web browsers refuse to parse malformed XML.