Live data from Hacker News

Offshore wind will be a $1T industry by 2040, but it's needed now

utilitydive.com

181–182 of 182 posts

Re: Offshore wind will be a $1T industry by 2040, but it's needed now

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The cynic in me thinks the reason fossil energy companies are keen to invest in wind and solar is that they don't believe it can operate independently of natural gas backup any time in the near future and they want to secure some baseline level of demand going forward by ensuring it wins out over nuclear (fission or fusion), advanced geothermal or any other promising low-carbon generation option that doesn't have int…

Another reading is that those companies are in the energy business and at some level don't really care how it's generated as long as it's utility scale and has sufficiently low cost that they can make money. After all you still need distribution networks, load management, marketing, sales, administration, etc. regardless of where energy comes from. That's what energy companies provide.

Renewables tend to come with less risk and volatility as well. No oil spills,geopolitics affecting prices,etc...

Re: Offshore wind will be a $1T industry by 2040, but it's needed now

#182
post #177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see dead ones at the San Gorgonio wind farm all the time. I imagine the maintenance situation is even worse for offshore installations.

Are they dead/broken or market optimizing power delivery? Spinning a few down to nothing can be better for a farm total life time efficiency. You might make more money curtailing output because it is easy to turn off a wind turbine, compared to reacting with an inflexible baseload plant.

For many I can't tell the difference between off and broken, but some are clearly broken (missing blades, collapsed towers, etc). Supposedly a lot of the companies that were originally operating in the San Gorgonio pass went out of business, and their old windmills are being gradually replaced.
Post reply on HN