Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

sourcehut.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 72 posts

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#51

Post by somacert »

rossmohax wrote: post #45
ddevault wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is actually planned to be supported soon. I recently provisioned a 64TB NAS for the purpose of object storage. It'll support things like release binaries, builds.sr.ht artifacts & build caches, a github pages-esque feature, etc. I just need to figure out how the heck Ceph works.

Another way of doing it is to run minio federation , might be a worthy alternative to Ceph, which has a reputation of hard to run product.

I thought ceph had a reputation of easy to run, at least compared to it's rivals in the distributed storage space. (gluster, lustre, et al)

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#52

Post by Felk »

Boulth wrote: post #34
juped wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, Bitbucket's view is just gitk on the web, which is exactly how I like it.

Wow, really beautiful! I wonder how do they do these graphs...

If you're into reading C code, you could probably check how git's `git log --graph` is implemented: https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/graph.c

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#53

Post by jlarocco »

MoratoriumBone wrote: post #21

I've been a sourcehut user for about half a year now and I have to say that it has been a breath of fresh air for me. I have used GitHub and GitLab for years, and detest working with either. I know that both companies have a lot of smart people behind them, but both GitHub and GitLab are horrendously slow to use on my internet connection and packed to the brim with what I could consider anti-features. With sourcehut…

Interesting - as much as I like sourcehut, my only complaint is that it's noticeably slower than GitHub for me. It's not terrible, by any means, but I've noticed it a few times when I push to both.

My guess is that I'm closer to a GitHub datacenter (or AWS region?) because they have an office here in Boulder.

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#54

Post by gbear605 »

jlarocco wrote: post #53
MoratoriumBone wrote: post #21

I've been a sourcehut user for about half a year now and I have to say that it has been a breath of fresh air for me. I have used GitHub and GitLab for years, and detest working with either. I know that both companies have a lot of smart people behind them, but both GitHub and GitLab are horrendously slow to use on my internet connection and packed to the brim with what I could consider anti-features. With sourcehut…

Interesting - as much as I like sourcehut, my only complaint is that it's noticeably slower than GitHub for me. It's not terrible, by any means, but I've noticed it a few times when I push to both. My guess is that I'm closer to a GitHub datacenter (or AWS region?) because they have an office here in Boulder.

Try again; Sourcehut just updated their pull/push logic to make it significantly faster.

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#55

Post by zokier »

Boulth wrote: post #34
juped wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, Bitbucket's view is just gitk on the web, which is exactly how I like it.

Wow, really beautiful! I wonder how do they do these graphs...

Here is one exploration of commit graph drawing: https://pvigier.github.io/2019/05/06/commit-graph-drawing-al...

discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21079643

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#56

Post by jordigh »

juped wrote: post #15

Sourcehut needs a graphical history view (akin to gitk or git log --graph; not sure what the mercurial equivalent is, definitely NOT ANYTHING LIKE that "network graph" github has) to be feature complete. I'd contribute but I have more free money than free time; is there some kind of bounty program?

> git log --graph; not sure what the mercurial equivalent is,

`hg log --graph` works

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#58

Post by juped »

zokier wrote: post #55
Boulth wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, really beautiful! I wonder how do they do these graphs...

Here is one exploration of commit graph drawing: https://pvigier.github.io/2019/05/06/commit-graph-drawing-al... discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21079643

That repository maintainer should've octopus merged those commits in the example...

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#59

Post by tomcam »

MoratoriumBone wrote: post #21

I've been a sourcehut user for about half a year now and I have to say that it has been a breath of fresh air for me. I have used GitHub and GitLab for years, and detest working with either. I know that both companies have a lot of smart people behind them, but both GitHub and GitLab are horrendously slow to use on my internet connection and packed to the brim with what I could consider anti-features. With sourcehut…

I absolutely adore GitHub and I’m genuinely curious: what are the anti-features you were talking about?

Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha

#60

Post by tyeager »

As a new GitLab product manager, I was glad to see among the Updates that dispatch.sr.ht can now build GitLab commits. And we are looking at the mentioned GitLab bug (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/16491) to assess efforts to resolve; and unblock the ability to run build.sr.ht for GitLab merge requests.
Post reply on HN