I couldn't find any place to send in the issues with SourceHut. I like the UI, but can't use web-site at all, if i go anywhere outside of my profile it brings in - register or log-in button and link and if I click log-in it says: > Error logging in > Error occured retrieving account info. Try again.
Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
41–50 of 72 posts
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#42Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#43I couldn't find any place to send in the issues with SourceHut. I like the UI, but can't use web-site at all, if i go anywhere outside of my profile it brings in - register or log-in button and link and if I click log-in it says: > Error logging in > Error occured retrieving account info. Try again.
Can you reach out to sir@cmpwn.com? This sounds like your account confirmation email was never acted upon.
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep, this is planned and in-progress. You can now prepare patchsets on the web for submission via email (check out the video near the top of TA), and code review threads are parsed and shown on the web as well (see the screenshot under the video). The plan is to keep improving this so that you can perform code reviews on the web, which become emails under the covers, which will make for a decentralized, email-based c…
One of the things stopping me from using sourcehut is that people I’ve partnered with recently for projects are intimidated by the email system. I haven’t gotten a chance to try that flow yet because of that I use it for a few solo projects though
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#45One angle that I'm not sure sourcehut even intends to address but am curious how to idiomatically handle: artifacts. Right now I can (and do) host code in (git|hg).sr.ht and make sure that it compiles with builds.sr.ht, but there isn't an artifacts.sr.ht (and I understand not intending there to be, unless you charge by use and maybe not even then), but it would be nice if I could have the full CI/CD pipeline on sourc…
This is actually planned to be supported soon. I recently provisioned a 64TB NAS for the purpose of object storage. It'll support things like release binaries, builds.sr.ht artifacts & build caches, a github pages-esque feature, etc. I just need to figure out how the heck Ceph works.
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#46[1] https://lobste.rs/s/z0sqez/sr_ht_sircmpwn_s_github_alternati...
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#47Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#48I'm excited for names.sr.ht! Relatedly, a long time ago on an early lobste.rs post [1] about sourcehut, it was mentioned that it'd be sweet to point one's own domain at sourcehut to be able to host your stuff under your own domain. It'd be extra cool if this worked with mailing lists too. Drew, any chances something like this might come along with names.sr.ht? [1] https://lobste.rs/s/z0sqez/sr_ht_sircmpwn_s_github_al…
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is actually planned to be supported soon. I recently provisioned a 64TB NAS for the purpose of object storage. It'll support things like release binaries, builds.sr.ht artifacts & build caches, a github pages-esque feature, etc. I just need to figure out how the heck Ceph works.
Another way of doing it is to run minio federation , might be a worthy alternative to Ceph, which has a reputation of hard to run product.
Re: Sourcehut's Year in Alpha
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is actually planned to be supported soon. I recently provisioned a 64TB NAS for the purpose of object storage. It'll support things like release binaries, builds.sr.ht artifacts & build caches, a github pages-esque feature, etc. I just need to figure out how the heck Ceph works.
Another way of doing it is to run minio federation , might be a worthy alternative to Ceph, which has a reputation of hard to run product.