11–20 of 168 posts
"We have noted that similar attacks have also been carried out against Wikileaks itself, yet so far, nobody has been arrested in connection with these attacks, nor are there even any signs of an investigation into this issue at all," I think that is one of the most important points of this article.
What's the justification for no-knock raids here?
What's the justification for no-knock raids here?
"We have noted that similar attacks have also been carried out against Wikileaks itself, yet so far, nobody has been arrested in connection with these attacks, nor are there even any signs of an investigation into this issue at all," I think that is one of the most important points of this article.
Where were Wikileaks' servers hosted at the time? The US cops are going to go after the crimes against US businesses on US soil first.
"We have noted that similar attacks have also been carried out against Wikileaks itself, yet so far, nobody has been arrested in connection with these attacks, nor are there even any signs of an investigation into this issue at all," I think that is one of the most important points of this article.
"We have noted that similar attacks have also been carried out against Wikileaks itself, yet so far, nobody has been arrested in connection with these attacks, nor are there even any signs of an investigation into this issue at all," I think that is one of the most important points of this article.
Does the FBI even investigate this sort of thing internationally? Does anyone?
Countries outside America do have law enforcement agencies for the most part, so yes.
What's the justification for no-knock raids here?
It's funny that Mastercard can't defend against an attack that my home router is capable of defending against. (A big limit on connections per /24 per minute should solve this problem. So will using a smart webserver or frontend proxy that doesn't care how many idle connections there are. Then all you have to worry about is bandwidth saturation rather than your servers crashing.) But the lesson here is, when you visi…
Just use some JS to create image elements, script tags, iframes etc all with sources pointing at the target, should be able to do a few hundred a second at least.
Even trivial to get people to participate without using javascript. Just pop in a hidden iframe with a million tags in the source.
As things move on, I don't think individuals who happen to fire off a few hundred requests at a website should be investigated/prosecuted/etc. Website owners just need to get better at protecting their systems.
"We have noted that similar attacks have also been carried out against Wikileaks itself, yet so far, nobody has been arrested in connection with these attacks, nor are there even any signs of an investigation into this issue at all," I think that is one of the most important points of this article.
Does the FBI even investigate this sort of thing internationally? Does anyone?