Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
1–10 of 70 posts
Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#2Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#3Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#4Quickly though, almost in your back, each single bit/feature/line of code added to the mix multiplies with the others, and it's over already.
Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#5This guy already said it best: http://www.quora.com/Dropbox/Why-is-Dropbox-more-popular-tha...
There's some real gems in here from the founder of Syncplicity.
For instance, not having a Mac client meant that the tech press wouldn't touch it. Then, they wouldn't write about it. That's pretty enlightening.
Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#6It's so easy to overlook the benefits of staying obsessively focused. Quickly though, almost in your back, each single bit/feature/line of code added to the mix multiplies with the others, and it's over already.
In reality, adding a software feature is often like adding onto a house in the center of it, expanding the rest of the house around it to make room. Suddenly the job looks a lot tougher.
Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#7Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#8It makes me wonder what other services might benefit from native clients....
Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#9This guy already said it best: http://www.quora.com/Dropbox/Why-is-Dropbox-more-popular-tha...
Thanks for linking to the original. There's some real gems in here from the founder of Syncplicity. For instance, not having a Mac client meant that the tech press wouldn't touch it. Then, they wouldn't write about it. That's pretty enlightening.
Apparently sometimes a small minority of customers still can make all the difference.
Re: Why Dropbox Succeeded and Syncplicity Didn’t
#10I can no longer count the number of companies I've talked to who imploded under the weight of their own features.