Live data from Hacker News

We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

blog.torproject.org

41–50 of 67 posts

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#41
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This reads like one of those articles where they list established services and casually include an unknown one. It's best to disclose your affiliation.

Anybody know of any other privacy-oriented Dropbox/Drive alternatives?

I don't know much about them, but Sync https://www.sync.com seems to be in this space.

Has a 5GB free tier, higher tiers cheaper than dropbox. Based in Canada if that matters.

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#42
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This reads like one of those articles where they list established services and casually include an unknown one. It's best to disclose your affiliation.

Anybody know of any other privacy-oriented Dropbox/Drive alternatives?

I've seen a HN poster promote filestash.app which looks like it's either self-host or hosted. I guess you might have to add in something like Spideroak, Backblaze, or tarsnap if you want to self host + backup.

Or Syncthing as others have pointed out.

I'm still thinking which is best.

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#43
post #11

And to continue with privacy oriented solutions that allow you to better avoid surveillance... -Alternative to Gmail: ProtonMail ( https://protonmail.com/ ) -Alternative to Google: DuckDuckGo ( https://duckduckgo.com/?t=hk ) -Alternative to Dropbox and GoogleDrive: Duple ( https://www.duple.io/en/ ) -Alternative to Whatsapp: Signal ( https://signal.org/ )

Just gonna toss StartPage ( https://www.startpage.com/ ) out there as an alternative to Google. DDG uses bing under the hood. StartPage proxies requests to Google. I've just personally found the latter to give better consistent results, particularly with my searches for technical/programming issues.

You might reconsider your use of StartPage. It was taken over by an Ad company recently.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21371577

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#44
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what it actually is. If you look at cloudyo's comment history, its all about Duple.

I don't mind self-promotion on HN, especially if they built it themselves, but this is a bit much.

And unfortunately using multiple accounts too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21500881

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#45
post #11

And to continue with privacy oriented solutions that allow you to better avoid surveillance... -Alternative to Gmail: ProtonMail ( https://protonmail.com/ ) -Alternative to Google: DuckDuckGo ( https://duckduckgo.com/?t=hk ) -Alternative to Dropbox and GoogleDrive: Duple ( https://www.duple.io/en/ ) -Alternative to Whatsapp: Signal ( https://signal.org/ )

Duple home page states "CREATE YOUR OWN PRIVATE CLOUD AT HOME, IN ONE CLICK." This is blatantly false as is most everything that advertises itself as "one click". Please change it to a real number like, oh I don't know, 12 maybe? Plus a bunch of keystrokes... Sorry for the unsubstantial comment but this really grinds my gears.

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#46

Didn't FBI track down and catch Dread Pirate Roberts despite all the Tor network/browser anonymity? Did he do something stupid to break his anonymity or did FBI break Tor in some way?

Ross Ulbricht made some mistakes by reusing account names etc that he had made on the clearnet[0, 1]. But at the time there were (tinfoil-hat-wearing) folks that thought that this was actually parallel construction and Tor was backdoored.

Here is the relevant section from the Times article on the IRS agent that figured it out:

"""

Mr. Alford’s preferred tool was Google. He used the advanced search option to look for material posted within specific date ranges. That brought him, during the last weekend of May 2013, to a chat room posting made just before Silk Road had gone online, in early 2011, by someone with the screen name “altoid.”

“Has anyone seen Silk Road yet?” altoid asked. “It’s kind of like an anonymous Amazon.com.”

The early date of the posting suggested that altoid might have inside knowledge about Silk Road.

During the first weekend of June 2013, Mr. Alford went through everything altoid had written, the online equivalent of sifting through trash cans near the scene of a crime. Mr. Alford eventually turned up a message that altoid had apparently deleted — but that had been preserved in the response of another user.

In that post, altoid asked for some programming help and gave his email address: rossulbricht@gmail.com.

"""

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ulbricht#Silk_Road,_arres...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road_(marketplace)#Arrest...

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/27/business/dealbook/the-uns...

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#47

Didn't FBI track down and catch Dread Pirate Roberts despite all the Tor network/browser anonymity? Did he do something stupid to break his anonymity or did FBI break Tor in some way?

Allegedly, fake IDs en route to DPR were intercepted at the Canadian border, and that investigation yielded Ross Ulbricht. Whether or not this is a plausible explanation is a matter of perspective.

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#49
post #11

And to continue with privacy oriented solutions that allow you to better avoid surveillance... -Alternative to Gmail: ProtonMail ( https://protonmail.com/ ) -Alternative to Google: DuckDuckGo ( https://duckduckgo.com/?t=hk ) -Alternative to Dropbox and GoogleDrive: Duple ( https://www.duple.io/en/ ) -Alternative to Whatsapp: Signal ( https://signal.org/ )

We've banned this account, as well as associated accounts and website, for abusing HN for promotion.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you won't do that in the future. That means: (1) not using HN primarily for promotion, but participating sincerely in the community; (2) not using multiple accounts to promote your site; (3) not systematically deleting promotional articles after you've posted them; (4) being up-front about your association with your site instead of obscuring it.

Re: We Can Choose an Internet Without Surveillance

#50
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anybody know of any other privacy-oriented Dropbox/Drive alternatives?

I don't know much about them, but Sync https://www.sync.com seems to be in this space. Has a 5GB free tier, higher tiers cheaper than dropbox. Based in Canada if that matters.

I'm using them for years as a form of backup. Very reasonable priced, works flawlessly for me though I mainly use as a form of backup for a synced folder. GDPR compliant.
Post reply on HN