The malign applications of this technology greatly outweigh the benign. Discuss.
Yes, I think there are almost no legitimate uses for the Farnsworth Device. https://theinfosphere.org/A_Device_That_Makes_Anyone_Sound_L... My personal hell: My mother has dementia and a land line telephone. Scammers call all the time. All day long. (Although the last few days have been pretty good, I assume somebody somewhere is doing their jobs. The scammers will adapt.) One thing they do is spoof their number to h…
AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
71–80 of 338 posts
Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#72Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#73AI can make decisions, create deep fakes, and now, clone voices. It may be that the next big business opportunity lies in creating 'anti-AI' technology just as it did with antiviruses in the 90's and 2000's
AI that detects AI seems entirely plausible. And like all “anti” measures, is another arms race (and if I put my scifi hat on, is what may lead to AI self-awareness).
Link to talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObhK8lUfIlc
Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#74VCTK p260: all over the place accent-wise.
LibriSpeech: can't really comment on the American examples, but they seem decent.
Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#75Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#76So....I'm going to paste the abstract here because the headline is incredibly misleading and should be changed. >Abstract: We describe a neural network-based system for text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis that is able to generate speech audio in the voice of many different speakers, including those unseen during training. Our system consists of three independently trained components: (1) a speaker encoder network, trained…
Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#77Now if you were to take something by a well known person (where there is a great deal of audio) it would be much harder to clone anything other than a really short passage.
This would be similar to faking handwriting. Easier to fake one word than to fake three pages. Easier to fake something where you have little to compare a pattern (less can go wrong).
Not saying this isn't impressive it is. But it's also a bit of a trick based on the very short clips (both samples and created).
I would say that a trained person could do a better fake because they could take into account all the info and be less likely to make a mistake.
Now sure you could manually change the AI as well doing the same thing.
Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#78AI can make decisions, create deep fakes, and now, clone voices. It may be that the next big business opportunity lies in creating 'anti-AI' technology just as it did with antiviruses in the 90's and 2000's
AI that detects AI seems entirely plausible. And like all “anti” measures, is another arms race (and if I put my scifi hat on, is what may lead to AI self-awareness).
The anti-spam software loses because eventually having self-aware AI view spam calls 24/7 was considered torture and they weren't allowed to go that far.
Re: AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds (2018)
#79AI can make decisions, create deep fakes, and now, clone voices. It may be that the next big business opportunity lies in creating 'anti-AI' technology just as it did with antiviruses in the 90's and 2000's
Good luck with that. The best product you'll come up with is some sort of snake oil. The whole point of GANs is that you can't really "detect" the synthesized components anymore. Not that this would/will stop people from claiming otherwise in the spirit of profitablity :-)