Haha. Thanks for the joke for a dark day in Hong Kong.
Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
81–90 of 225 posts
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#82This comment is going to collect the most votes yet is predicted to be Bad: 0.9320 - Good: 0.0800
This is somewhat interesting. If what is stated in the comment itself is true then that means the poster had to solve to find x and y such that 'This comment is going to collect the most votes yet is predicted to be Bad: x - Good: y' would give Bad: x and Good: y as the output when passed through the neural net. Maybe they also manipulated other parts of the comment to find x and y.
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#83"Can a neural network predict if your HN post title will get up votes?"
Bad: 0.9917 - Good: 0.0076
I'm sorry guys!
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#84"fuck facebook fake and unsexy"
=> Good: 0.9885
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#85In response to this article, I was expecting insightful comments on the neural network itself and how to improve it, but instead I'm mostly reading funny attempts to play with the scoring :)
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#86SCOTUS Rules Constitution Unconstitutional
Bad: 0.9999 - Good: 0.0001
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#87Bill gates dead. Bitcoin buy now Good - 1.0 Bad. - 0.0 What do I win?
And the inverse:
https://i.imgur.com/tJPp31G.png
"Steve Jobs is resurrected. Buy bitcoin"
Good 0.0, Bad 1.0
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#88Show HN: Can a neural network predict if your HN post title will get up votes? Bad: 0.0598 - Good: 0.9307 Can an AI predict if your HN post will go viral? The results will shock you Bad: 0.9539 - Good: 0.0401 Seems to work!
Lol, you forgot to put "Show HN" in the second one :p
Not quite:
>> Show HN: Can an AI predict if your HN post will go viral? The results will shock you
Bad: 0.8326 Good: 0.1575
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#89Interesting: "A mouse killed our network engineer" - Bad: 0.2068 - Good: 0.7895 VS "A rat killed our network engineer" - Bad: 0.9698 - Good: 0.0322
[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#90It's basically a buzzword detector. "this is just a tool for detecting buzzwords" => Bad: 0.9991 - Good: 0.0011 "this is merely a device for detecting artificially sophisticated words" => Bad: 0.0019 - Good: 0.9980
"linux for sohpisticated when if contextual what but then" => Good: 0.9986 "linux for sohpisticated when if contextual what but then what" => Good: 0.0201
sohpisticated ?