Bad: 0.9988 - Good: 0.0013
Pretty sure HN would break if this actually happened.
71–80 of 225 posts
Bad: 0.9988 - Good: 0.0013
Pretty sure HN would break if this actually happened.
Bad: 0.0046 - Good: 0.9951
Bill Gates Talks Philanthropy, Microsoft, and Taxes: Bad: 1.0000 - Good: 0.0000 Here is link I posted let's see. It's 100% bad. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21523295
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The results for "The results for this particular HN post are:" are: Bad: 0.9800 - Good: 0.0220 NB. Sorry for that, I just had to do it :)
The results for "The results for "The results for this particular HN post are:" are:" are: Bad: 0.8083 - Good: 0.1910
It's basically a buzzword detector. "this is just a tool for detecting buzzwords" => Bad: 0.9991 - Good: 0.0011 "this is merely a device for detecting artificially sophisticated words" => Bad: 0.0019 - Good: 0.9980
=> Good: 0.9986
"linux for sohpisticated when if contextual what but then what"
=> Good: 0.0201
Tried: Can a neural network predict if your HN post title will get up votes? - Bad: 0.9917 - Good: 0.0076 I think it sums up all.
Bad: 0.0598 - Good: 0.9307
It's all about that Show HN.
Bill gates dead. Bitcoin buy now Good - 1.0 Bad. - 0.0 What do I win?
Each word added, "bitcoin", then "buy", then "now", drops the score lower until it hits 1.0 bad.