Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
1–10 of 225 posts
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#2Are you tired of getting 0 up votes on your post? Wouldn't it be nice to have a tool to test if your title will draw people's attention?
Well, this project doesn't offer this tool, but it tries.
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#3The results for this particular HN post are:
Bad: 0.0598 - Good: 0.9307.
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#4well, I typed "Court: Suspicionless Searches of Travelers’ Phones and Laptops Unconstitutional"
Bad: 0.9969 - Good: 0.0032
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#5You forgot to mention the time-zone in your analysis.
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#6"Show HN:" gets "Bad: 0.0002 - Good: 0.9998". Interestingly, entering a one-word title will get it stuck on "Bad: 0.4528 - Good: 0.5472".
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#7It would be nice to include an analysis of how good is this with real data. Perhaps pick all the submission from yesterday and show the correlation between the real points and the prediction.
The distribution of points is very 0 heavy. It can be a problem to represent it and to model it.
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#8"The future of emulation in compiler optimization LLVM haskell"
Bad: 0.0004 - Good: 0.9996
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#9"Trump" - Bad: 0.4528 - Good: 0.5472
"Can Trump" - Bad: 0.9862 - Good: 0.0142
"Will Trump" - Bad: 0.9896 - Good: 0.0108
"Show HN: Trump" - Bad: 0.9735 - Good: 0.0225
Re: Show HN: Testing HN titles against a neural network
#10This comment is going to collect the most votes yet is predicted to be Bad: 0.9320 - Good: 0.0800