Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
21–30 of 156 posts
Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#22I am using it on Ubuntu 10.10, looks amazing, is there any way to add syntax highlighting for other languages (Go in my case)
Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#23This reminds me of the top post yesterday.
Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#24Sublime Text is awesome, the main reason I was being stuck with Windows for a long time. But having to use bash and not wanting to pay a lot of money made me learn Emacs. How many people are willing to pay 59$ for a pretty simple (yet awesome, but not in the sophisticated feature-rich Java-world way) editor? My bet it isn't public information but maybe someone have similar statistics
Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#25Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#26Sublime Text is awesome, the main reason I was being stuck with Windows for a long time. But having to use bash and not wanting to pay a lot of money made me learn Emacs. How many people are willing to pay 59$ for a pretty simple (yet awesome, but not in the sophisticated feature-rich Java-world way) editor? My bet it isn't public information but maybe someone have similar statistics
I don't understand why a programmer who is prepared to switch editors (a really big thing!) would in anyway be swayed one way or the other by $60.
Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#27Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand why a programmer who is prepared to switch editors (a really big thing!) would in anyway be swayed one way or the other by $60.
well, I pay like only 1.5x times more for my room. just to compare our costs of living
Re: Sublime Text 2: Public Alpha Released
#29Sublime Text is awesome, the main reason I was being stuck with Windows for a long time. But having to use bash and not wanting to pay a lot of money made me learn Emacs. How many people are willing to pay 59$ for a pretty simple (yet awesome, but not in the sophisticated feature-rich Java-world way) editor? My bet it isn't public information but maybe someone have similar statistics
I don't understand why a programmer who is prepared to switch editors (a really big thing!) would in anyway be swayed one way or the other by $60.
Now I know that a text editor is programmer's basic tool, but if $60 represents one week of your salary and you are already on a tight budget, then I can see how one could not afford that.