The title and tone of this article make it sound unusual that the company used its IP as collateral. You can get better loan terms (such as the interest rate) if your loan is secured. If you are going to get a secured loan, the default is that it's secured by 'all assets', which includes IP. In order to perfect a security interest in IP, you need to make this type of filing -- and a lender will be especially sure to…
At least some of their key patents ( https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130128230/en?oq=inassi... ) are nearly halfway though there lifetime, so at best those patents will have a decade of value before they get a retail product out the door. It seems a bit like putting a decade old car up as collateral, sure it's got value but it's rapidly diminishing.
All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
61–70 of 109 posts
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#62> Magic Leap is estimated to have over 1,800 employees and 19 office sites. For a company that has no consumer product and has no revenue, to have this many employees is quite shocking to me.
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#63How did they ever raise such capital? I want in on it. Capex for R&D is prohibitive.
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reason it makes headlines is because the value of IP is very volatile and bogus collateral is a very old scam (not only in banking btw, fake valuations are a feature of many scams). If I go to the park, pick up a rock, and then go to a bank and say there is diamonds inside worth $1m, and they lend against that then I have made $1m. If you lend against collateral, you are making a bet on the collateral being worth…
They released their product months ago.
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
They released their product months ago.
Did they? I googled "buy magic leap" and all I can find are dev units ("Creator Edition"). That's not a consumer product. That's a pre-requisite for a consumer product. Magic Leap have never released a product for general sale.
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#66I’m really hoping magic leap makes it in the long run. They’re a huge tech employer in south Florida, and frankly we could use more tech companies. I’m always afraid a recession will wipe them out and flood the market with experienced engineers.
They're a hedge bet made by VCs who don't want their LPs asking "why didn't you bet on the obvious market leader?" if AR blows up.
They cannot do anything but fail.
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#67Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least some of their key patents ( https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130128230/en?oq=inassi... ) are nearly halfway though there lifetime, so at best those patents will have a decade of value before they get a retail product out the door. It seems a bit like putting a decade old car up as collateral, sure it's got value but it's rapidly diminishing.
Patents have value even if you never get a product out the door.
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#69The title and tone of this article make it sound unusual that the company used its IP as collateral. You can get better loan terms (such as the interest rate) if your loan is secured. If you are going to get a secured loan, the default is that it's secured by 'all assets', which includes IP. In order to perfect a security interest in IP, you need to make this type of filing -- and a lender will be especially sure to…
Re: All Magic Leap Patents Have Been Assigned to J.P. Chase Morgan as Collateral
#70Is it possible for ML to be viable at all? Assuming they manage to make $1000 profit eventually per device, they will need to sell at least half million devices each year. It seems militery usage probably won't be able to fund this alone as the size of US militery is just 1.5M. In US, 40M iPhones are sold each year and one can think of largest possible market for $2000 devices is likely around 5M to 10M per year. So 10% of that is certainly possible if there was a compelling experience device.