One with Vim
invisibletheory.com
One with Vim
1–10 of 129 posts
Re: One with Vim
#2Re: One with Vim
#3"been around since 1991"?! while that's probably correct for vim proper, that ignores the much longer history of vi...
Re: One with Vim
#4Re: One with Vim
#5The Command-T plugin [1] was a big help in switching from TextMate to vim. I have no idea how anyone can be productive in vim without it (assuming you're working on a multi-file project). 1. https://wincent.com/products/command-t
or
:NERDTree
Re: One with Vim
#6The Command-T plugin [1] was a big help in switching from TextMate to vim. I have no idea how anyone can be productive in vim without it (assuming you're working on a multi-file project). 1. https://wincent.com/products/command-t
:e . or :NERDTree
Re: One with Vim
#7The Command-T plugin [1] was a big help in switching from TextMate to vim. I have no idea how anyone can be productive in vim without it (assuming you're working on a multi-file project). 1. https://wincent.com/products/command-t
:e . or :NERDTree
NERDTree is great for browsing your project and managing your files, but for opening files (when you know their names) you really can't beat the speed of Command-T/PeepOpen. They're in another league.
I don't know how people work without it.
Re: One with Vim
#8The Command-T plugin [1] was a big help in switching from TextMate to vim. I have no idea how anyone can be productive in vim without it (assuming you're working on a multi-file project). 1. https://wincent.com/products/command-t
I also stick to buffers rather than tabs (for terminal/gui consistency) and use buftabs, which I quite like.
Re: One with Vim
#9 (length (remove-if (lambda (b) (not (buffer-file-name b))) (buffer-list)))
42Re: One with Vim
#10Vim is easier on the hands, but Emacs (with ido-mode) still feels better for working with multiple files: (length (remove-if (lambda (b) (not (buffer-file-name b))) (buffer-list))) 42