Live data from Hacker News

Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

ericasadun.com

51–60 of 71 posts

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#51
Am I and everyone I know the only people using newer MBPs with no issues? I’m not without complaints, but it seems hardly a week goes by without the same stuff being brought up for the past few years. What’s unique about Apple products that draws so much attention, popularity?

I do miss MagSafe, but I love being able to use any of the ports without thinking about it and sharing accessories. I don’t really use the touchbar so I guess that could go.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#52
post #12

Surprised she did not mention MagSafe. This is, IMO, the single biggest unforced error Apple has made in a decade filled with them.

Yes, this is really my biggest issue with the new MacBooks or rather was my biggest issue, until I found out there are numerous magnetic connectors and complete cables for USB-C[1]. Now that I use such a cable (L shape, like MagSafe 1), I find it better than the T shaped MagSafe 2 cables, which would disconnect/fall off all the time from my 2015 MBP. 1) Like this one (no affiliation at all): https://www.amazon.com/Ma…

Yes, there are adaptors like that, and my dad uses them. Unfortunately he has to keep removing it to plug in other USB-C devices (e.g. USB-C to HDMI) in the port next to it, because it's so wide that it blocks the neighbouring port.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#53

Does anyone else find it crazy that the base SSD in the Air and MBP is still only 128 GB? The Air I can maybe understand, but for the MBP, it's ridiculous.

I have used a 128GB Macbook Pro for almost two years and only when I go nuts with Docker images do I approach my limit. My projects and saved content (books and images) are fine on an external drive and if I ever need one of my projects when I don’t have my external drive I can just clone the repo. Everything that you value needs to follow the 3-2-1 rule so anything that is even vaguely important can be retrieved from a cloud backup. I guess if I did not have network access it could be problematic but I have yet to be in such a scenario.

Of course it would be nice for Apple to lay off the price gouging but it by no means makes the device useless. I also reinstall my OS frequently and organize my data very deliberately so that takes away a lot of the decision-making that people try to avoid when using one big hard disk. I really only want MacOS and my applications on the device.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#54

Does anyone else find it crazy that the base SSD in the Air and MBP is still only 128 GB? The Air I can maybe understand, but for the MBP, it's ridiculous.

For the Air, I imagine it's because they assume people just watch YouTube all day and store everything in the cloud.

For the Pro, it's probably for corporations who want to save money on office laptops. I don't need 128GB for work, only for personal use. Some users would also choose the 128 GB model and fit their own 2TB Intel 660P with an adaptor... except oh no they can't, because the SSD is soldered on to the motherboard now.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#55

Am I and everyone I know the only people using newer MBPs with no issues? I’m not without complaints, but it seems hardly a week goes by without the same stuff being brought up for the past few years. What’s unique about Apple products that draws so much attention, popularity? I do miss MagSafe, but I love being able to use any of the ports without thinking about it and sharing accessories. I don’t really use the tou…

[deleted]

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I zomg when I use my 2008 MacBook Pro. That solid keyboard! All those ports!! User replaceable everything!!

Have you updated your hard drive for an SSD? I'm considering buying a 4TB Samsung 860 EVO for my 2007 MacBook Pro. Maybe two, one in the optical bay.

Yes, it’s reasonably speedy for many tasks.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#57

Does anyone else find it crazy that the base SSD in the Air and MBP is still only 128 GB? The Air I can maybe understand, but for the MBP, it's ridiculous.

For the Air, I imagine it's because they assume people just watch YouTube all day and store everything in the cloud. For the Pro, it's probably for corporations who want to save money on office laptops. I don't need 128GB for work, only for personal use. Some users would also choose the 128 GB model and fit their own 2TB Intel 660P with an adaptor... except oh no they can't, because the SSD is soldered on to the moth…

I think they use terrible specs just to market a lower starting price.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MagSafe had two flaws: the magnetic connector could become unreliable, and the cable around the connector was weak. USB-C is rated for a much higher number of inserts and being able to insert on either side is covering a lot of my old vulnerable cable situations. I don’t know enough about EE to say why they don’t want a magnet between the USB-C connector and the rest of the cable.

I'm still using a laptop with a MagSafe charger and have never seen the connector becoming unreliable (nor do I know anyone has had this issue).

We had a substantial minority of our chargers at work develop the issue. It’s not a black-and-white state so you might just know people who became more deliberate about attaching it over time.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#59
post #26

I've come up with a modern version of Gate's saying of "640K ought to be enough for everyone". 95% of people are fine with an i7 and 16GB of RAM. If you're not running a bunch of VM's, that's enough computer. That's my 2012 MacBook Pro, and it's still getting the job done.

Sounds like my mid-2015. I thrash it with DaVinci Resolve (video) and Lightroom (photo editing), Photoshop, etc - all prosumer tools. It copes well enough that I don't feel pressured to upgrade.

Re: Falling Back to an Older MacBook Pro

#60

Does anyone think the TouchBar should be relocated to where the "MacBook Pro" logo resides? That way it'd be in front of your eyes and fingertips.

If TouchBar was above the function key row, as opposed to replacing it, everyone would praise it as yet another example of Apple's genius at UI/usability. But it's not, so they don't.
Post reply on HN