Earlier quoted context omitted.
just because they're in the majority doesn't mean they're sane, imo.
I’m fairly sure the majority of people don’t believe in literalist young earth creationism. It’s mostly a thing in certain Protestant sects, and regionally (especially in Turkey) in Islam. If you’re talking about the vaguer “evolution happens, but, er, maybe a deity did something non-specific about it”, then that’s more common, granted.
Catholics have a lot of grey area too (https://www.catholic.com/tract/adam-eve-and-evolution), they struggle with the random mutation and natural selection aspects that form the basis of evolutionary theory:
> However, it says that, if they did develop, then they did so under the impetus and guidance of God
There is also the literal adam and eve:
> In this regard, Pope Pius XII stated: “When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains either that after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parents of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now, it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the teaching authority of the Church proposed with regard to original sin which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam in which through generation is passed onto all and is in everyone as his own”
Fortunately souls don't exist, so at least that doesn't conflict with the bible.