Live data from Hacker News

‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

nytimes.com

71–80 of 134 posts

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#71
post #15

This is silly. The only party here marking the end of "friendly generational relations" is the NY Times itself. Drawing lines through society is the cheapest and easiest way to look wise without making any meaningful comment.

This article was already posted and flagged once.

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#72

Generational names have always been created by authors to sell books. Adam "Ruins Everything" Conover did a talk at a marking conference where he pulled up old copies of Time magazine talking about the entitled baby boomers from decades ago; almost identical to the same articles about every other generation. Generational titles were NEVER used to lift anyone up. They were used to sell books, sell newspapers/magazines…

The NYT has sections of serious news, and sections of ridiculous "trend" articles. The trend articles are easy to source, easy to write, and have a shot at making it to page 1 of HN. I tend not to read them, or at least not to believe them when I read them--Mithidratism from reading too many such articles long ago.

But then I'm an old bitter boomer, so what do I know?

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is pretty much it. My generation has been called entitled, lazy, selfish, etc, for wanting the same things our parents were given, like a living wage, affordable college, or career stability. In what world is that friendly?

Mmm there's that word again, "given."

The boomers also have a pretty strong sense of entitlement. Some would argue that millennial are entitled to feel "entitled".

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is pretty much it. My generation has been called entitled, lazy, selfish, etc, for wanting the same things our parents were given, like a living wage, affordable college, or career stability. In what world is that friendly?

Mmm there's that word again, "given."

I don’t think the boomer generation “earned” cheaper college. That was given to them either by circumstance or by the previous generations. Similarly, post-war prosperity wasn’t something they had earned or worked for.

The contention is that the world left by boomers has less opportunity than what the one provided to them. It’s not entirely true (if you’re black in America, the civil rights movement sure changes a lot for the better), but that’s the argument.

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#75
post #38
post #15

This is silly. The only party here marking the end of "friendly generational relations" is the NY Times itself. Drawing lines through society is the cheapest and easiest way to look wise without making any meaningful comment.

Actually this phrase started around October 15th on TikTok. The phrase’s use in related videos grew rapidly and had not existed before. It’s real sentiment. The fault with this article is that it focuses on merchandise. Edit: here’s the first video I saw it trend in comments: http://vm.tiktok.com/553g7w/

https://rbt.asia/g/search/text/%22ok%20boomer%22/page/5/

Many occurrences before October 15th. "Ok boomer" has been a phrase in internet culture for a while now.

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#77

Really? i thought i ended when everyone was talking about how millennials are ruining companies by not buying affordable products. Or saying millennials are poor because they like avocados. Or saying millennials are entitled for demanding a living wage.

This is pretty much it. My generation has been called entitled, lazy, selfish, etc, for wanting the same things our parents were given, like a living wage, affordable college, or career stability. In what world is that friendly?

Our parents. Are you talking of Gen X? The boomer generation? In general, your statement seems to apply to Gen X. But not really the boomer generation - e.g. they didn't have affordable college like Gen X did. Gen X seems to have been at the crossroads of things shifting and kind of got the best of all worlds.

And for Millennials, some have it rough but some don't. College was cheap and affordable for some of them - certainly more affordable for them than the boomer generation. Keep in mind the generation spans to 1981. Some Millennials are almost 40 now.

Gen Z is in a whole other category of course. Lots of things going/have gone rapidly downhill. But boomers mostly aren't the parents of these people. It's Gen X/Millennials.

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#78

Really? i thought i ended when everyone was talking about how millennials are ruining companies by not buying affordable products. Or saying millennials are poor because they like avocados. Or saying millennials are entitled for demanding a living wage.

Those were all divisive articles written by the same media companies trying to fill in ad space. They're playing both sides. Maybe it's time to stop taking many news articles at face value and realize they're trying to make a profit.

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#79
post #69

> there’s not a lot that I can personally do to reduce the price of college Thinking you need to get a college education is the real big Scam you can thank previous generations for. It will be fun to watch more and more of them wake up and refuse two other big scams which are marriage and male gender role (women woke to this one decades ago).

Getting off topic here, but having a degree would do wonders for my network and career mobility.

Re: ‘OK Boomer’ Marks the End of Friendly Generational Relations

#80

Really? i thought i ended when everyone was talking about how millennials are ruining companies by not buying affordable products. Or saying millennials are poor because they like avocados. Or saying millennials are entitled for demanding a living wage.

This is pretty much it. My generation has been called entitled, lazy, selfish, etc, for wanting the same things our parents were given, like a living wage, affordable college, or career stability. In what world is that friendly?

In defense of "the Boomers," and believe me I have plenty of gripes about trends within that generation, we Millenials aren't exactly above reproach.

I can agree that it's not nearly as easy for us as it was for the past few generations, but it's not nearly as grim as most make it out to be. To put it bluntly, I see a lot of the same "me me me" mentality that the Boomers have been criticized for.

There's the idea that life is just handed to us, so long as we "do the right things." It's perfectly possible to own a home, raise a family, what have you. You just might not get to work the job you want, study the degree program you want, or live in the neighborhood you want.

There never was a "turnkey" existence.

Post reply on HN