I think it's a little too early to come to a full conclusion here. Google is constantly testing layout changes in SERPs and it seems like OP ended up in a test. The thread is 4 weeks old and I haven't seen or read anything on these changes anywhere but on this thread. I still think Google's general direction is clear with more webmaster incentives for structured data, amp and also Google just straight up answering qu…
Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
111–120 of 337 posts
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#112Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#113This is a purely anti-user move. No user gains anything by it, this actually helps phishing sites. Oh, and it happens to help Google's AMP effort, which can now pretend to be the original site even more effectively. Time to get everyone to use Duck Duck Go, and to get rid of those Google CAPTCHAs which are an even bigger data harvesting operation than search.
Do we have any recourse against this monopoly, other than voicing our concerns repeatedly while they ignore us? Can we launch a class action lawsuit against Google if they harm people by limiting consumer choice, and force us to be tracked everywhere using reCAPTCHA v3 and various other methods? Keep in mind that not sending your data to Google is not a real option, there are several government services, health care…
> Keep in mind that not sending your data to Google is not a
> real option, there are several government services, health
> care providers and utility companies using reCAPTCHA,
> you personal data either gets harvested by Google,
> or you're barred from accessing essential online services.
Google is not the problem, the government services, health care providers, and utility companies are the problem. You will need to get in touch with your local ombudsman and deal with each one individually.Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#114I’m each day more pissed off with AMP. It’s taken over the web to such degree that it became essentially a first barrier to whatever content I’m accessing.
The experience is so terrible that I refuse to use it, so there goes another tap reload to access the real thing.
And sometimes the site refuses me. For whatever reason, I get stuck on a poorly implemented Google paywall even though I’m a paying customer of the site.
And now this. Wrapping the original URL on search results wasn’t enough it seems.
Add that to Gmail’s general suckiness and I can see them bleeding the advanced users that got them where they are pretty fast.
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#115This is a purely anti-user move. No user gains anything by it, this actually helps phishing sites. Oh, and it happens to help Google's AMP effort, which can now pretend to be the original site even more effectively. Time to get everyone to use Duck Duck Go, and to get rid of those Google CAPTCHAs which are an even bigger data harvesting operation than search.
Do we have any recourse against this monopoly, other than voicing our concerns repeatedly while they ignore us? Can we launch a class action lawsuit against Google if they harm people by limiting consumer choice, and force us to be tracked everywhere using reCAPTCHA v3 and various other methods? Keep in mind that not sending your data to Google is not a real option, there are several government services, health care…
Once upon a time, Congress used to write and pass laws to protect Americans from egregious abuses of power like this. Of course, that time is long gone.
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would love to switch to DDG, but it consistently gives me search results that do not contain s search term at all, even when I wrap it in double quotes. So they give me thousands of non relevant search results.
Duckduckgo uses Bing search in the back end, which is dogshit. Alternatively, you can use Startpage, which uses Google results, but anonymized.
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#117This is a purely anti-user move. No user gains anything by it, this actually helps phishing sites. Oh, and it happens to help Google's AMP effort, which can now pretend to be the original site even more effectively. Time to get everyone to use Duck Duck Go, and to get rid of those Google CAPTCHAs which are an even bigger data harvesting operation than search.
Would love to switch to DDG, but it consistently gives me search results that do not contain s search term at all, even when I wrap it in double quotes. So they give me thousands of non relevant search results.
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Duckduckgo uses Bing search in the back end, which is dogshit. Alternatively, you can use Startpage, which uses Google results, but anonymized.
Duckduckgo claims to use 400 sources [0], so you’re probably not totally spot on. Edit: However, that includes their Instant Answers feature, and the numbers are outdated, it’s 1600 sources, most of which are catering to an specific and tiny niche (like angular.js docs, or a dictionary of accounting terms). Main sources are Bing, Yahoo, Wolfram Alpha and their own crawler (according to Wikipedia). [0] https://help.du…
It's mostly Bing/Yahoo/Yandex rebranded depending on the country.
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do we have any recourse against this monopoly, other than voicing our concerns repeatedly while they ignore us? Can we launch a class action lawsuit against Google if they harm people by limiting consumer choice, and force us to be tracked everywhere using reCAPTCHA v3 and various other methods? Keep in mind that not sending your data to Google is not a real option, there are several government services, health care…
What is wrong with just not using Google instead?
Re: Google are removing URLs entirely from search results?
#120So I wonder if Google plans to drop URLs from actual search results. And if they do, whether using Startpage, or DDG with the Google option, would still show them.