Live data from Hacker News

Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

cnbc.com

701–710 of 784 posts

Re: Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

#701
post #607

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> small town high school football star That's odd thing to call the biggest software company* in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_software_c... * Alphabet

That wiki doesn't justify your statement. It's leveraging a list from 2017, but using Alphabet's market cap from 2019? And regardless, the actual market caps on that page would say Microsoft is the biggest software company in the world. I have no idea what Forbes is using for its ranking but it is obviously not by valuation. EDIT: And it should arguably be Apple, but for some reason neither Apple nor Amazon are softw…

And market cap while it measures investor sentiment, doesn’t measure fundamentals. If it did, Uber wouldn’t be worth anything.

Re: Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

#702
post #651

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you run it with Bluetooth off logging locally and then sync periodically? I doubt it but haven't dove into it

The logging works ok while off bluetooth...but be aware that _any_ changes are basically impossible in that state. Even basic watch functionality like changing the time or setting an alarm require a bluetooth link, the software, and an internet connection back to the fitbit servers.

Well, that's a conpletely pointless limitation. Nothing of good was lost...

Re: Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

#703

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm on the outside but always had the impression Eric Schmidt was calling most of the "do evil" important things.

I don't really have any special evidence to the contrary, but I suspect Schmidt gets a bad rap simply because of his appearance and demeanor of looking a bit stodgy like a bureaucrat from the federal Gov or something. He also has a very serious face. I think he was basically a competent CEO who steered the company away from risky businesses.

Every Andrew Carnegie needs his Henry Frick [0].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestead_strike#Plans_of_Carn...

Re: Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

#705

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not exactly a clone, you had to pay to get answers on Google Answers.

> "Asker-accepted answers cost $2 to $200. Google retained 25% of the researcher's reward and a 50 cent fee per question. In addition to the researcher's fees, a client who was satisfied with the answer could also leave a tip of up to $100." [0] I'm quickly understanding why I've never heard of Google Answers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Answers

It turns out advertising is still more profitable than charging users.

Re: Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

#707
post #446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nah, what they want is me, ie. my data. I'm throwing away that fitbit (Google Personal information gathering device) and deleting my account. I'm informed enough to make that decision. Unfortunately thousands of users that just got sold out are not. Fuck Google.

I just deleted my Fitbit account and will for sure be confirming whether it's deleted in 7 days.

How will you confirm this?

Re: Google Buys Fitbit for $2.1B

#710

Garmin and Apple have the fitness market covered. Fitbit never had the hardcore fitness market Garmin executed into and Apple has always had a product that works well across the wearable and fitness. Between these two companies I can't imagine there's much of a niche Fitbit does better. On the extreme hardcore triathlon user even Garmin has taken a lot of market from Suunto and the like. I've owned a handful of Garmi…

I disagree. The wearables market is still wide open IMO and there is still plenty of room to make a truly compelling product.
Post reply on HN