Live data from Hacker News

The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

aclu.org

131–140 of 158 posts

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#131
post #15
post #2

After listening to Joe Rogan's interview with Edward Snowden I bought and listened to his book "Permanent Record." At this point I have to assume that at least a dozen agencies in a handful of countries are watching me through my webcam as I type this message right now. Snowden suggested (or at least I inferred) that he didn't reveal all there is to know about the scope of government surveillance and it's only logica…

They aren't watching you. They're recording you. They're running algorithms to classify and index you. They're building massive data centers to house all of this semi organized and raw data. And when they leak it all they won't be held accountable because terrorists, children, and stuff. It's not a conspiracy theory. It's real and it's a black hat's wet dream. Oh yeah, they can use it for political purposes too I sup…

Also -- and I swear I read thid in the NYTimes, but I can't find it -- CEOs are now not uncommonly ditching cellphones and laptops before going into important meetings.

In a general sense, this sort of thing seems to have the potential to have incredible conseauences for liberty, justice, the economy and Western society.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- do you know anyone who has been stalked, harassed, worse? or: do you have kids? - yes (hopefully) - would you tolerate use of software that allows users to more effectively stalk, harass, or worse? [especially your kids?] - no (hopefully) - are you aware that software with that power exists today, and that since at least 2007 some of its users have been convicted of using it for stalking/harassing/worse? - no, tell…

> - would you tolerate use of software that allows users to more effectively stalk, harass, or worse? [especially your kids?] It's easy to dream up ideal scenarios, such as the above (even though they are almost never realistic). For example, one possible unexpected response to the above question might very well be: > "Such as Tor?"

Or, the one I get the most, "But it's our government and I have nothing to hide from them." So while they wouldn't want private actors to have that information, they're fine with the government having it because they still believe the law is actually fair and impartial and such.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#133
post #7

I wish we would stop emphasizing the social justice/accuracy concerns so heavily when talking about this. Starting that way will cause a huge segment of the population to switch off as soon as you start talking. Imagine it works perfectly, and a three-letter agency with practically zero oversight, transparency, or accountability is collecting an accurate history of every single thing you do--everywhere you go, who yo…

Yes. I don't believe our government is inherently evil and unjust. They have and will continue to have access to all this information legally anyway (if it exists, they can legally get it). On the plus side, I see a lot of positives with this. I'm tired of graffiti everywhere. The other day I was walking home and some kid picked up a metal trash can on the corner of 37th and 8th, dumped it in the middle of the road a…

> All of these bad actors can be weeded out. The possibilities actually excite me.

Sure, right up until someone in power decides that you are the "bad actor" and weeds you out.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#134
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The web is made from HTML, CSS and Javascript. Considering the World Wide Web predates Javascript by many years, and the fact it's possible to create a functional, readable, and accessible Web page without Javascript altogether, this characterization is absolutely inaccurate.

Do you ride a horse to get to work, too?

You’re an asshole. If I could downvote your post, I would.

JavaScript and CSS can add a lot of bloat, unnecessary load times, and add massive security vulnerabilities. Sometimes you just want information, you know, without waiting forever and getting hacked.

I have decent bandwidth and I still find myself turning it off a lot.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#135
post #116
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's great if websites work without Javascript but, I don't think its fair to call them poorly designed if they dont. The web is made from HTML, CSS and Javascript. Turn off one of them and of course things aren't going to work or look right.

Javascript required for text rendering is incredibly poor design. For those of us with limited connections, I turn off Javascript because I don't want to download 10MB of Javascript ad tech and frameworks. This is expensive and takes forever to load on satellite and rural connections. Good design takes these basic common issues into account.

rural != common

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#136
post #7

I wish we would stop emphasizing the social justice/accuracy concerns so heavily when talking about this. Starting that way will cause a huge segment of the population to switch off as soon as you start talking. Imagine it works perfectly, and a three-letter agency with practically zero oversight, transparency, or accountability is collecting an accurate history of every single thing you do--everywhere you go, who yo…

Why is that causing a huge part of the population to switch off? That's insane.

Starting with a practical, serious, and concrete discriminatory problem sounds like a great place to start vs some general ethical issue with surveillance.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I've spoken with people who have said they are ok with it, when I start asking questions or sharing details on how this has been abused I tend to find they have not thought it through In the future just ask them to unlock their phone and hand it to you so you can look at their email, text and browser history. Watch them hesitate and refuse.

This form of argument was covered in Daniel J. Solove's ''I've got nothing to hide'' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy (available to read online), which goes into some detail about how such analogies are rather easily countered since they're not based on actual examples (privacy 'dead bodies' so to speak) that demonstrate abuse/negative impacts. In this case the analogy being made is that by accepting certain fo…

Even if they reason themselves out of this concern, if that data ever leaks then it will pretty much be like handing over your phone. It'll likely even come with years worth of data.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#138

I remember a time when it was good manners to ask before taking someone's picture.

Ironically, I suspect people are more concerned now about random people taking their photo, or photos of their children. Remember the outcry over Google Glass?

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And on the off chance someone reading this is OK with the government doing that for law enforcement purposes, also consider that >At least a dozen U.S. National Security Agency employees have been caught using secret government surveillance tools to spy on the emails or phone calls of their current or former spouses and lovers in the past decade, according to the intelligence agency’s internal watchdog. before giving…

> and store it in a database forever. This is an important point. Most people are deciding what they're ok with based on today's circumstances, government etc. What happens if some years from now, your past behavior is at odds with the current government. You will be flagged and there will undoubtedly be consequences, which, even if minor are still negative. E.g., flagged for searches at border crossings.

It can be much worse than what you mentioned. At some point this surveillance technology will trickle into the hands of every government and they will take advantage of it. What's the chance that none of the warlords in countries in conflict will use this for their advantage? And that could easily be used for mass murder.

Re: The FBI Is Tracking Our Faces in Secret, and We’re Suing

#140
post #7

I wish we would stop emphasizing the social justice/accuracy concerns so heavily when talking about this. Starting that way will cause a huge segment of the population to switch off as soon as you start talking. Imagine it works perfectly, and a three-letter agency with practically zero oversight, transparency, or accountability is collecting an accurate history of every single thing you do--everywhere you go, who yo…

Why is that causing a huge part of the population to switch off? That's insane. Starting with a practical, serious, and concrete discriminatory problem sounds like a great place to start vs some general ethical issue with surveillance.

Because the discrimination problem is separate issue here. It leaves room for the idea that "if they just fix the discrimination problem, then this is fine". It's not, because privacy violations affect everyone. Even if they were somehow able to make these systems not discriminate, we would still not have moved even a little on the issue of mass surveillance.
Post reply on HN