Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah let's pretend guns don't exist. Knives exist too, those are weapons, better ban them. You could throw apples at someone for long enough and probably hurt them a good bit, better ban them too. The sterilized world you want to live in is not necessarily the one that everyone else wants to live in.
Apples aren’t specifically designed to kill people. You don’t have mass school shootings where dozens of kids are attacked by apples and suicides caused by apples are significantly fewer than those by guns. The two aren’t even remotely equatable.
‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
71–80 of 163 posts
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s a shame they don’t allow female nipples but allow male nipples. Clear cut sexism, and is there no way to sue them?
It's even worse when you consider how it's based in binary gender thinking. Are a transgender person's nipples allowed, or not? It ends up being such a mess. A gender-neutral standard would be better.
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#73Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#74How will they even police this? If I say "Hey come over for dinner tonight :eggplant:", is that sexual innuendo or am I making my famous eggplant parmigiana?
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#75It's fine as long as they don't ban ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs like U+130BA.
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#76I'm not really sure what group they're catering to here. Everyone who is at least 12 years old knows what those emoji mean. My guess is they must be doing this in order to help protect women from sexual harassment. What they're really doing here is trying to ban an entire way of thinking. That's just not going to happen.
I wonder if it is also to prevent solicitation of sex on their platform. I wonder if there was a code of emojis used to agree on terms. Which banning the use of these emojis just means they use something else. Whack a mole.
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would guess that the key factor is whether or not a body part is significantly erogenous. AFAIK, many more women than men find their nipples to be a source of sexual arousal. EDIT: I hope people reading my post understand the difference between explaining vs. endorsing another party's reasoning.
The key factor is the arbitrary sexual moral of the country where FB is headquartered.
That said, I think it's silly. They're a technology company that should be able to come up with a technical solution. Twitter handles nudity just fine.
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#78Why not also ban the gun emoji? Oh wait this is an American company where violence is OK but sex is taboo.
Yeah let's pretend guns don't exist. Knives exist too, those are weapons, better ban them. You could throw apples at someone for long enough and probably hurt them a good bit, better ban them too. The sterilized world you want to live in is not necessarily the one that everyone else wants to live in.
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
this is everyone's reaction to this, and why this article is gaining traction on HN
But it's true. It seems like this policy change would prevent a consenting couple from "flirting" over Facebook by using emoji's but would allow a politican to create false content for an ad.
Re: ‘Sexual’ use of eggplant and peach emojis banned on Facebook, Instagram
#80Does this apply to private chats? Because I'll send these in a joking way to my girlfriend and some of my other friends. I know that Facebook messenger parses chats and won't allow porn site links and torrent magnet links to go through.
I guess this applies to reported content, and maybe for content for wider audience (like public post / group / ...)? I.e. if you send eggplant to your GF via chat, and she does not report you, it's fine. But if she receives private eggplant sex message from some rando and she report him, that should count as violation.