I liked DDG a lot .. but when I discovered that it is effectively an UI over Bing (Yahoo?), I am a lot less impressed. Is there any search engine which is NOT backed by an extremely heavyweight player?
This comment is made a lot but it's only half true. DDG does use Bing to source some of it's results but it does have it's own crawlers too. In practice this means that it isn't "effectively a UI over Bing".
DuckDuckGo Terminal Interface
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo Terminal Interface
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's one of the most popular sites on the internet already. https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/duckduckgo.com It's also built into browsers. So, whatever they're doing, it's working.
Except for searching, right? I mean what is the average number of links which DDG returns you for your ordinary search query? Is it even close to Google's results? And what about it's relevance?
Re: DuckDuckGo Terminal Interface
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://github.com/jarun/ddgr
Nice, though I suspect a bunch of the parameters can be submitted with the request. I've got a bash function wrapper around w3m that fires off searches from the shell. It's not a dedicated DDG client, but then again, after you hit the search results, the goal is to view the results page. This does use the "lite" page, which is console-browser friendly-er ddg () { w3m https://duckduckgo.com/lite?q="$*&fd=-1" } Full pa…
ddg ()
{
w3m https://duckduckgo.com/lite?q="$*&kd=-1"
}