Nautilus was good when they started but at some point they seemed to switch to the sort of frothy, inspirational pop-science-as-spiritualism dreck that belongs in Newsweek or Fox News, but with a tiny bit more depth
On top of the content, I was a paid subscriber during 2017-2018, and I received maybe 20% of the editions I was supposed to receive. Probably due to international shipping and their liquidity problems, but it still felt bad.
Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
41–50 of 63 posts
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think ownership groups aren't uncommon in the small business world (as in not-startups, like family businesses). Totally different world but that's how sports teams' acquisitions are handled these days.
Wow, that's fascinating -- I don't know too much about sports team acquisitions but it's pretty cool if that's how they work. If this is something you know more about, would you mind going into more detail about how that works?
Most leagues also have requirements for how much of the team can be paid for with debt, loans, etc. For a perspective on how crazy the skyrocketing valuations are, NBA and MLB teams outside major markets were going for under $500M and NFL teams for way under $1B. Major market teams were still going for a lot like NFL’s Washington DC Redskins went for over a billion 20 years ago, but even just five years ago the NBA’s Milwaukee Bucks went for around $500M. Now that they have a new stadium, sometimes that stuff is conditional on the purchase, their value has probably doubled (along with currently being a championship contender with an MVP superstar entering his prime).
At this point, almost no individuals can take on a whole team purchase on their own. Or be able to pay up a higher price on their own. Exceptions are also people wildly richer than most owners like Steve Ballmer who’s around top 15 richest people and paid handsomely for the NBA’s LA Clippers, though he will also profit off it as well. Many, if not most, current big 3 majority owners would not be able to afford their own team if you looked at their net worth outside the team.
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#43But that is life and if they do, there will be something else.
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#44Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
> several smaller and successful subscription-based magazines: ... the economist, ... Maybe I am misreading, but did you mean to imply that The Economist is a 'small' newspaper? It has been around since the 1840s.
compared to the best known subscription success stories -- the NYT, WP -- it certainly seems significantly smaller. but i agree, that comparison isn't very valid, it's certainly a heavyweight amongst magazines.
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#46I spent $100 on subscriptions a couple Christmases ago. Never received any product nor was I able to get in contact with anyone at the company. Really turned me off since I was a big fan of their content and already had a yearly subscription.
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#47Actually it is one of the best file explorers out there, I'm sure they will take in on the right track.
This is one of those rare occasions that it might be worth your while to read the actual article...
Though as a science fictional character myself, I'm partial to Vernes's. Which might make for an even more interesting story ;-)
"Nautilus Magazine" being a good start.
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#48I spent $100 on subscriptions a couple Christmases ago. Never received any product nor was I able to get in contact with anyone at the company. Really turned me off since I was a big fan of their content and already had a yearly subscription.
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#49So it becomes a business, which will focus on generating profit from the magazine, thus Nautilus will become yet another bog standard science magazine subjected to the same structures as other magazines. And we all know that consumers don't fork enough money to support ads-free journalism, which leads to perverse incentives.
> hus Nautilus will become yet another bog standard science magazine ~subjected to the same structures as other magazines~ that will hopefully pay its contributors now! https://undark.org/2017/12/13/freelance-writers-nautilus-pay...
Re: Nautilus to be acquired by an investor group of fans
#50Nautilus was good when they started but at some point they seemed to switch to the sort of frothy, inspirational pop-science-as-spiritualism dreck that belongs in Newsweek or Fox News, but with a tiny bit more depth
This is the best description of this type of science writing I've encountered.