Live data from Hacker News

Google Announces .new Domain Availability

whats.new

151–160 of 166 posts

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But when you can book an appointment at a ford dealer next to you that would be kind of "action generation". Or what is when Ford will never get ford.new, is it free to register by anyone?

> Or what is when Ford will never get ford.new, is it free to register by anyone? Trademark law still exists, this is a solved problem.

[deleted]

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, good luck when your app gets flag by their bot, broken because the .new no longer works, and you can't get a hold of Google to remove you from their blacklist. Just read all the horror stories about apps on Google Play.

Well that would be a different issue... But their requirements / vision for the .new domain are not unreasonable or ill-intentioned.

Well intention doesn't help you if the execution sucks.

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#153
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They seem quite different, restrictive, and onerous to me. In particular "registrations must have websites that are both live and compliant within 100 days of registration". You can't register a domain to use later, you have to get something up quickly, something that satisfies Google's vague "action" requirements.

That part is actually positive though - if you want to squat a domain for over 100 days too bad.

And how is that supposed to work in reality if your project takes more then 100 days to build?

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#154
post #67

Wouldn’t it be so much better if domains were specified the other way? new.github.repo It makes more sense and sounds better in most languages too Although from the point of view of HTTP we already have verbs for that. It should really be POST github/repo Or maybe in user friendly display: new github/repo I guess maybe usa.github and in.github can be different domains because different organizations may have same nam…

"Treating a TLD as a verb is just silly. It comes at the end of the sentence..." Yes, ending a sentence in English with a verb is definitely something that you never do. Can you imagine how ridiculous that'd be?!

You should read Mark Twain’s essay about the “terrible German language”.

Fine — it’s not a verb, it’s an adjective after a noun.

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But when you can book an appointment at a ford dealer next to you that would be kind of "action generation". Or what is when Ford will never get ford.new, is it free to register by anyone?

> Or what is when Ford will never get ford.new, is it free to register by anyone? Trademark law still exists, this is a solved problem.

Would only apply is the domain is being used with cars. Ford is a common last name.. could be dentist call to action.

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#156
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I get that, but rather than Google opening it up for open registration and having the usual domain land grab, they could have created domains for each action and allow service providers to register intents in their services for each action. It's going to make discovery of actions much harder if there are different actions for different providers. It will also mean the usefulness of the pattern will be limited ba…

They could have used subdomains: dominos could register dominos.pizza.new and pizzahut could register hut.pizza.new pizza.new could then list and search through all the registered subdomains (and would be hosted by google).

Typing: dominos.pizza.new / login and select last order / reorder

vs typing dominos / click the link / login and select last order / reorder.

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#157

There's a requirements list, by the way: "That means that all .new domains registrations must: - Be used for action generation or online content creation; - Take the user directly into the action generation or content creation flow; - Resolve to the action within 100 days of registration;* and - Allow Google Registry to verify compliance at no cost."

I'm wondering how that would work for an online shop. Lets say I went to amazon.new - what should I expect to see? Maybe a new empty shopping cart? Or a list of new products that have just been added to the store? I think new products would be most intuitive for a shop.new domain...

The only limited use is sharing content. facebook/new would go to a share page. Twitter. Reddit.

Pointless but I guess they are trying to justify the cost of .new

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#158
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's something I do frequently, my browser autocompletes an ordinary long URL after 1-2 characters. It doesn't seem very game-changing to have to type in a whole short URL instead. What am I missing?

My browser is not reliably auto-completing URLs to specifically post a new tweet, or create a new calendar entry, or write a new email, etc. Those URLs are often long and bulky. The intent of .new is when you know you want to perform a specific action (like write a new doc), you type in the first few characters of the related .new domain name, let the browser autocomplete do the rest, and now you've already got the n…

You can usually teach the browser URLS by typing the start of the long bulky address and pasting the rest and pressing enter, then repeating that a few times. If you always do it by going to the homepage and navigating, that's what the browser learns.

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

mail.new seems broken as well, it hard-requires an @google.com login.

Lol, looks like google engineers forgot about their entire g suite customer base.

Even free users. It's the corporate email domain. Public mail is exemple@gmail.com

Re: Google Announces .new Domain Availability

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

mail.new seems broken as well, it hard-requires an @google.com login.

Lol, looks like google engineers forgot about their entire g suite customer base.

Well yes but also they forgot about gmail. It requires @google.com not @gmail.com
Post reply on HN