Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Answering like that is conceding the point. But they have conceded the point. I think that's why things like Cambridge Analytica were mentioned so many times during the hearing.
There's a difference between "yes, Cambridge Analytica used our platform to do bad things and we facilitated that" and "our platform is fundamentally bad for you", though.
But if you can't give a convincing answer to "What are you doing to prevent that happening again?", then everyone's going to make that conclusion anyway.