Live data from Hacker News

What costs are exponentially dropping?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 67 posts

Re: What costs are exponentially dropping?

#51

- Costs of delivering mass to orbit. - Nanotubes - Graphene - Internet costs (I'm pretty sure it's dropping faster than exponentially) - CDN and storage in general - Many medical procedures I expect meat prices to collapse in the next 10 years.

Up to recently, storage costs (GB/$) looked like an parabola in a monolog graph.

Re: What costs are exponentially dropping?

#53

Food (not the largest exponent, but probably the longest history)

I'm not sure. I did some analysis comparing the cost of basic grocery items in the early 20th century to now and they aren't that different. I used the price of gold at the time vs now and the average daily wage to try to get a better feel for relative prices. Over hundreds or thousands of years, yes, definitely. All that said, it seems like automation could push the cost of food to near zero in the coming decades.

These guys find that the price of food per hour of unskilled labour wage was about 8 times higher in 1919. https://fee.org/articles/food-prices-in-1919-compared-to-tod...

Re: What costs are exponentially dropping?

#54

Cost per GFLOPS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLOPS#Hardware_costs Probably the clearest chart that explains why machine learning is blowing up now, despite the fact that the same neural network architectures existed since 1990s (e.g., LeNet-5). It's because cost dropped from $47,000 per GFLOPS to $0.02!!!

That $0.02 value is entirely bogus. It is based in the published 30 "teraops" for Xavier, which it uses as teraflops and assumes is comparable to the other flops values. ($699/30 "TFLOPS" = $0.02 $/"GFLOP"). "Teraops" counts int8 performance on the GPU plus the random vision and CNN ASICs in Xavier - it is definitely not equivalent to normal fp32 flops.

It looks like the GPU in Xavier can do 1.4 TFLOPS single precision, so the correct value is $0.49.

Re: What costs are exponentially dropping?

#55

Food (not the largest exponent, but probably the longest history)

Yes, it shouldn't be 'breadwinner' any more, but 'rentwinner' or somesuch.

People needing to go to food banks is because they have no money left after paying rent, utilities etc., not because food is expensive.

Re: What costs are exponentially dropping?

#57

To those that say DNA seq; although the cost to perform the actual sequence has dropped, there are still a ton of overhead costs in acquiring and managing any genomic data. Context - product platform guy at biobank.

My impression is that the cost of the actual sequencing has dropped so much that it is the overhead costs that now dominate.

Well indeed, the Wikipedia entry posted below https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlson_curve shows _total cost_ dropping down to a plateau at $1k since 2016.

Re: What costs are exponentially dropping?

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My impression is that the cost of the actual sequencing has dropped so much that it is the overhead costs that now dominate.

Well indeed, the Wikipedia entry posted below https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlson_curve shows _total cost_ dropping down to a plateau at $1k since 2016.

OK my bad, it is actually cost per genome. Don't -1 :)
Post reply on HN