Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't worry it sucks as a user as well. Curiosity pushed me to use Google SSO to circumvent their crap one time, and they allowed themselves to subsequently spam my inbox with a flurry of emails. I proceeded to click the "unsubscribe" link in one of them, but to my surprise the spam kept coming. Turns out they have more than a dozen mailing settings and you have to painfully disable each one of them individually. Of…
> I proceeded to click the "unsubscribe" link in one of them, but to my surprise the spam kept coming. I despise it when this happens. The only solution is to create a gmail filter to catch the entire domain and archive it or mark it as spam. It's surprising how many companies willfully ignore the unsubscribe option.
Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
91–100 of 243 posts
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#92They also use meta robots=noimageindex,noarchive on every page without an opt-out which is so incredibly stupid and walled-gardeny for an image sharing site. I wanted to use Flickr instead but nobody else uses Flickr, then I tried making my own image gallery and I learned that browsers do not honor the JPEG rotation EXIF data and I don't want to write my own rotation/cropping code (that and Google completely ignores…
It takes a couple of hours to write code to handle exif rotations.
def generate_with_wand(self, wand_img: WandImage):
# create stripped down version of our image:
wand_img.strip()
wand_img.auto_orient()
wand_img.compression_quality = 90
thumb = wand_img.clone()
thumb.transform(resize=self.size)
thumb.save(filename=str(self.get_output_path()))Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've added Pinterest to my reverse image search extension [1] to avoid having to sign up when there is no alternative source for the image. It returns Pinterest search results [2], and you can access the image directly from the image icon. I plan to release the image extraction module in a separate extension, so you can just click on the page area with the image, and it opens the image in a new tab. This way you will…
Thank you for creating this, it's an excellent extension!
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#94Support the federated alternative that is being built based on the same technology (ActivityPub) as Mastodon and Peertube. [1] https://pixelfed.org/ [2] https://github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed
Kay man, surely all my friends will be there
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#95Odd, private firefox search and opened https://www.instagram.com/kimkardashian/ just fine. I know, dumb example.
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#96They also use meta robots=noimageindex,noarchive on every page without an opt-out which is so incredibly stupid and walled-gardeny for an image sharing site. I wanted to use Flickr instead but nobody else uses Flickr, then I tried making my own image gallery and I learned that browsers do not honor the JPEG rotation EXIF data and I don't want to write my own rotation/cropping code (that and Google completely ignores…
They HAVE the full res image. There's even bookmarkets to snag the image. What twisted product goal led to the current state?
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#97They also use meta robots=noimageindex,noarchive on every page without an opt-out which is so incredibly stupid and walled-gardeny for an image sharing site. I wanted to use Flickr instead but nobody else uses Flickr, then I tried making my own image gallery and I learned that browsers do not honor the JPEG rotation EXIF data and I don't want to write my own rotation/cropping code (that and Google completely ignores…
Speaking of walled gardens. There is probably no service in this world that I hate more, as a non-user, than Pinterest.
I just created an account with an email but after few minutes of clicking around it locked me out. I can only use it again if I give them my phone number, too -.-
As if this wasn't enough of their invasive procedures my profile officially says "Account is blocked because of suspicious behavior".
This is some advanced trickery to fool users into giving them more data than they intended to do when creating a profile and it sucks.
There are more examples: Have you tried browsing Facebook or Xing as a user? It's all a really crappy experience.
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#98They also use meta robots=noimageindex,noarchive on every page without an opt-out which is so incredibly stupid and walled-gardeny for an image sharing site. I wanted to use Flickr instead but nobody else uses Flickr, then I tried making my own image gallery and I learned that browsers do not honor the JPEG rotation EXIF data and I don't want to write my own rotation/cropping code (that and Google completely ignores…
Speaking of walled gardens. There is probably no service in this world that I hate more, as a non-user, than Pinterest.
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#99BugMeNot to the rescue.
Re: Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public profiles
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
It takes a couple of hours to write code to handle exif rotations.
in python I use pywand: def generate_with_wand(self, wand_img: WandImage): # create stripped down version of our image: wand_img.strip() wand_img.auto_orient() wand_img.compression_quality = 90 thumb = wand_img.clone() thumb.transform(resize=self.size) thumb.save(filename=str(self.get_output_path()))