Live data from Hacker News

AirPods Pro

apple.com

331–340 of 391 posts

Re: AirPods Pro

#331
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>If you want inexpensive, SE 215 is what you're looking for, for $99. Shure has jumped the shark. I own these and have stopped endorsing them, the sound quality is utterly rubbish compared to some alternative wireless pairs, which might cost a little bit more, but even a punt on some of the cheaper pairs like Airdots et al. would be worth it.

* the sound quality is utterly rubbish compared to some alternative wireless pairs* Compared to airpods?

[deleted]

Re: AirPods Pro

#332
post #323
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not very well in my experience. I did try Airpods for a while and the volume control doesn't work properly. It was impossible to turn them down below a level that was still too loud. The microphone also apparently sounded horrible.

You can voice control volume on Android.

> You can voice control volume on Android.

Goodness, controlling something like volume by voice sounds _excruciating_. I rarely know where I want the knob to be and thus fiddle to the left and right until the desired level is reached. I wonder the ergonomics of this experience.

Re: AirPods Pro

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I want to buy something once and not have to think about it for a long time. A thousand times this ^ And ideally for everything: phone, computer, headphones, clothes, etc. Personally, I own one pair of pants that I know will last about 2 years before I need to replace them, then just buy exactly the same pair again. Same with t-shirts, except I own about 10 of the same and replace 2 or 3 once a year (each one will…

Kind of trying something similar. My jeans seem to be tough enough, but I’ve had a hard time with t-shirts. I’m looking for plain t-shirts without logos. What brands do you buy?

A little pricey, but they're merino so can be worn a few times without needing to be washed, and they're amazingly breathable and quick drying.

woolly.clothing

Re: AirPods Pro

#334
post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have a recommendation for sleep headphones that don't hurt your ears or fall out? I'm a side sleeper, so I've always found the ear I'm sleeping on to get irritated.

I use these (don't know why it says "Apple"; mine just use a headphone jack): https://www.bose.com/en_us/products/headphones/earphones/qui... Sleeping on my side isn't 100% ideal but they don't prevent it, for me. My biggest problem is turning over in the night and getting tangled up in the cord, then waking up slightly when I try to adjust it.

I toss and turn, a lot, so the wires aren't ideal for me, but I used to use my wired Apple headphones without the wires being too preventative. These are a bit pricy for my use case, but good to know that they might not hurt my ear as much.

Should note that I don't need noise cancellation, I just listen to audiobooks until I fall asleep on nights that I am having trouble getting to sleep, but have a partner who is a light sleeper and can't just play them on a speaker.

Re: AirPods Pro

#335
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>If you want inexpensive, SE 215 is what you're looking for, for $99. Shure has jumped the shark. I own these and have stopped endorsing them, the sound quality is utterly rubbish compared to some alternative wireless pairs, which might cost a little bit more, but even a punt on some of the cheaper pairs like Airdots et al. would be worth it.

* the sound quality is utterly rubbish compared to some alternative wireless pairs* Compared to airpods?

I would pick Airpods over Shure, but they don't fall in the $99 category! I was replying on the basis of a specific model and made it explicitly clear that an alternative pair meant either a foray into slightly expensive pairs (still cheaper than Airpods) or go all the all way to the bottom, for the more adventurous.

Re: AirPods Pro

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found it awful. I'm running on a very beefy development machine in the latest version of Firefox and it was kinda sluggish and very hard to read all of the information (felt like I had to scroll forever just to see a few sentences and pictures). It's also very inaccessible.

I ran it on my 2012 MacBook Pro in FF Dev Edition and it was fine /shrug

HiDPI screen alone can completely change performance characteristics of a website.

Re: AirPods Pro

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've demoed my $25 Anker or mpow earbuds (the Airpod-likes) to many coworkers sporting Airpods and they're universally astounded by the quality of the cheaper buds. I've converted quite a few people who lost their Airpods. The chead buds don't sound quite as good as Airpods, but they're 85% of the way there, fit better, can actually handle the rain and sweat without breaking down, can be used during exercise without…

>can actually handle the rain and sweat without breaking down That is my biggest issue, as a distance runner I have never had a pair of headphones last >6 months before they stop work (likely due to salt from my sweat). Its one thing to buy a pair of earpods for $29.99 every 6 months (and Apple usually gives me a pair free under the warranty), but I don't want to spend $150 every 6 months. I've been considering the b…

I hear you there, the same situation :) I am now on Powerbeats Pro that are quite expensive, and hope they will last.

Not afraid of rain, only of sweet, as I use earphones only inside on treadmill.

Re: AirPods Pro

#338
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me the answer is quite clear: they simply work. Apple like. Did I test all the others you mentioned? No. Probably because I used to have several Bluetooth headset. They hardly ever worked. For me, I had to have high trust in the HW company to ever test a Bluetooth headset again.

FWIW, I've tried to set up one pair of Airpods, and they were broken right out of the box. Wouldn't pair with anything. So that's a 1 in 1 failure rate ;)

Did you realize you had to press the circular button on the back of the charging case. It's hard to see and they won't pair with anything unless you do.

Re: AirPods Pro

#339
post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and, Anker allows 18 hours of continuous usage. That's the biggest draw for me.

Do you often spend 18 hours with your headphones in? Even on a long day I’ll have 5 minutes to charge them while talking to someone, using the bathroom or getting lunch.

i do! Well, not 18 hours. the Anker I bought "only" lasts about 12 hours (only the newest model gets 18).

I do a lot of home improvements and listening to audio books is how I make the experience tolerable. only having to charge my earbuds at night (along with my phone) is nice.

Re: AirPods Pro

#340
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? Airpods work with Android.

Not very well in my experience. I did try Airpods for a while and the volume control doesn't work properly. It was impossible to turn them down below a level that was still too loud. The microphone also apparently sounded horrible.

Huh, weird. I use the airpods every day on the Pixel 3a and they work great, both for calls and listening to music.

Maybe android fixed some bugs?

Post reply on HN