Live data from Hacker News

AirPods Pro

apple.com

91–100 of 391 posts

Re: AirPods Pro

#91

I have a pair of AirPods, and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t disappointed with them, the main reason being that they just don’t seem to fit in my ears very well, needing constant readjustment. Further, the sound quality is no better than the pair that comes with the iPhone that can be purchased for $29. I also find the nfc pairing nice, but also frustrating when it fails, and extra annoying when trying to check batt…

> the main reason being that they just don’t seem to fit in my ears very well, needing constant readjustment

It may simply be that your ears aren't a suitable shape - I've had this problem with every single pair of in-ear phones that I've ever tried and fitted hearing aids. At least the aids have over-the-ear clips so I don't lose them. I would be guaranteed to lose an AirPod within a week of owning them.

Re: AirPods Pro

#92

This is a huge improvement. The regular airpods are the same shape as the original iphone earbuds, and my normal ritual with those was to immediately throw them in the trash as soon as I opened any Apple product because they're horribly uncomfortable. Am I the only one who notices this?

They’re similar but not the same shape, and clearly neither are horribly uncomfortable to most people.

Re: AirPods Pro

#93
post #3

I will personally love to see someone justify spending $250 on wireless earphones whose batteries cannot be replaced. I'm a year and a half into my normal airpods and they already need new batteries.

I have Apple's PowerBeats Pros. They cost $250, and the batteries cannot be replaced. I expect them to last about two years, based on AirPods usage. And the footprint on those things is so minuscule in comparison to other aspects of my life that I could easily improve, I feel no need to justify my choice whatsoever.

EDIT: another comment prompted me to explain better. Money aside, for a bit of trash I get two years of entertainment, a quality experience, more enjoyable runs, something to listen to on my commute, a voice assistant for when my hands are full. All for a little pile of garbage after a few years. Now let's take a trip down the street to the teriyaki place close to work. EVERY TAKEOUT MEAL THEY SERVE generates more garbage than my earphones. If not the lithium batteries, for sure more plastic by weight or volume (let's not forget the styrofoam, either). For something that's going to be forgotten and floating in the toilet tomorrow morning.

I don't eat at the teriyaki place anymore for the above reasons. Leave me the hell alone about my headset choices. /EDIT

Though with a minute of thought, I'm pretty sure I could mount a reasonable argument for disposable, but smart, earphones reducing my footprint. But that's a longer discussion and beside the point. EDIT: for one example, see user ogre_codes experience with Walkmans.

Re: AirPods Pro

#94
post #45

Is hearing assistance in development yet? How far out is that? I'd shell out hundreds with a smile if these could be used to offset my hearing loss.

Live Listen is the closest they have right now. Works fine on the current AirPods, then again I don't have hearing loss.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203990

Re: AirPods Pro

#95
I’d be interested if the fit is better when it comes to running. I actually don’t have much of a problem with AirPods now that I got some Earhoox ($10 little silicon arms that wrap into your ear, which sounds skeevy when I type it out right now but it’s really changed my whole run experience). I only use them while running, though, and maybe these would be a better fit. OTOH, I don’t want noise cancelling while running in the city, so might not be worth the added dough.

Re: AirPods Pro

#96

I really struggled to take the plunge on the original AirPods and it has been one of my top 10 purchases ever in my life without a doubt. I stood there holding the little $200 box in my hand and really danced back and forth in my mind about whether or not they would really be necessary. If they broke, I would go buy a new pair immediately. For what they are, the sound is amazing. I can't really do a phone call anymor…

I have a Pixel 3 and the horribleness of the Pixel buds has me seriously considering a switch to Apple.

Re: AirPods Pro

#97
I’m going to get these as soon as I can. I’ve been addicted to my Bose 35 but tbh they are a bit bulky.

Also, I need noise cancellation and have been waiting for Apple to release their version of it.

A bit bold here but I’m going to assume their NC experience is beyond anything else on the market in the same form factor.

Look at Bose for example and their in-ear alternative; you have to wear a bulky necklace to get the same experience as their cabled version.

Nah, I feel like Apple is going to disrupt the entire NC market with these things

Re: AirPods Pro

#98
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let alone headphones? You could throw away a pair of AirPods every day and it would still constitute a tiny fraction of what (Americans) produce in waste on a yearly basis.

"It doesn't matter how much garbage I produce, everyone else makes way more!"

Replace "everyone" with "large corporations" and I think it's a pretty sound argument.

Re: AirPods Pro

#99
post #3

I will personally love to see someone justify spending $250 on wireless earphones whose batteries cannot be replaced. I'm a year and a half into my normal airpods and they already need new batteries.

Let me introduce you to the best pair of headphones for travel that I own: Bose QuietComfort 20 Acoustic Noise Cancelling Headphones, Apple Devices, Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X9KV0HU They are $250, wired and have a small battery brick that is not replaceable that is charged by micro usb. The newer one by Bose is one of those neck things and is $300.

I've owned the QC20i (two of them actually). The battery was never the issue. The durability was! I take a great care of all my electronics. And no matter how careful I was, the QC20i never lasted more than 2 years without some sort of connection issues.

Re: AirPods Pro

#100
What’s the word on active noise cancellation and hearing protection? I currently avoid using headphones in loud environments, and my quick test is if I can hear myself talk over the music.

This page says the active cancellation uses “anti-noise”, which iirc is noise, at frequencies that drown out the outside noise. But I’m not really sure about this.

So, if we were in say a 85 db environment, would music with these be at, say 90 db, or would it actually let you play safely at a lower volume like 80mm.

I know NRR headphones are best to actually block noise. But I’m curious what these do. Specifically related to hearing damage.

Post reply on HN