Live data from Hacker News

AirPods Pro

apple.com

71–80 of 391 posts

Re: AirPods Pro

#71
post #3

I will personally love to see someone justify spending $250 on wireless earphones whose batteries cannot be replaced. I'm a year and a half into my normal airpods and they already need new batteries.

Why spend $100 on a nice dinner, we'll just have to eat again in 8 hours.

Your dinner isn’t made of mold injected plastic.

Re: AirPods Pro

#72
post #3

I will personally love to see someone justify spending $250 on wireless earphones whose batteries cannot be replaced. I'm a year and a half into my normal airpods and they already need new batteries.

Why spend $100 on a nice dinner, we'll just have to eat again in 8 hours.

That's your argument? That we should now expect high-end consumer electronics to last as long as something that is literally consumable? Weak sauce.

Re: AirPods Pro

#73
post #3

I will personally love to see someone justify spending $250 on wireless earphones whose batteries cannot be replaced. I'm a year and a half into my normal airpods and they already need new batteries.

I guess that I’m the odd headphone user that buys them to listen to music with. Didn’t know people bought them to replace the batteries.

Re: AirPods Pro

#74
You've been able to get pretty decent Bluetooth in-ear headphones for $20-40 on Amazon for a few years now, can anyone comment on whether AirPods are really 10x better to justify the price? I just have a hard time believing that's possible, but I've never tried them.

Re: AirPods Pro

#75

I really struggled to take the plunge on the original AirPods and it has been one of my top 10 purchases ever in my life without a doubt. I stood there holding the little $200 box in my hand and really danced back and forth in my mind about whether or not they would really be necessary. If they broke, I would go buy a new pair immediately. For what they are, the sound is amazing. I can't really do a phone call anymor…

I find that I can't use them for phone calls because the other person always complains that my mic is terrible. Is this because of using an Android device?

They also don't stay in my ears for the life of me, so exercising at the gym I have to use over-the-ear headphones. I think this impacts the sound for me, as well, since they sound better when I hold them in my ear versus when I let go.

Any recommendations for what I'm doing wrong?

Re: AirPods Pro

#76
Been using the Beats Pro's since I lost my Airpods (later found them) and they are considerably better sound and far more comfortable to use and for workouts. I no longer have to have the volume cranked up to 11.

The original Airpods are amazing only because they work well at least 90% of the time, unlike just about every bluetooth headphone out there.

I have found the Beats Pro's generally as reliable and convenient but occasionally they flake out completely and are unable to pair properly with anything. Hours later they will work again. I've seen the a few threads online complaining about this behaviour. It is uncommon but a shockingly bad problem considering the cost.

Given what Apple is asking for, for these products they need to be pretty much perfect. I'll be interested to see how users review these.

Re: AirPods Pro

#77
post #49

The customizable fit is all I was looking for. I bought the originals but gifted them to my parents, because my ear is messed up from years of high school wrestling without wearing headgear. I know I'm an edge case, but there have been plenty of other great earbuds (wireless and traditional) that use soft flexible tips over the past decade.

The default Apple headphones that come with the iPhones never fit in my ears properly, so I've assumed traditional Airpods don't either. They should make dummy versions of the new ones so they can be tried out.

Go in to the Apple Store after release, they usually have models available for trying them out. They keep em stashed away in the drawers of those big tables, and use alcohol wipes to clean them before you try em on. I didn't know this until I recently went in to look at the Powerbeats and one of the employees asked if I wanted to try them before buying. Good thing I did, they didn't fit my ear canal comfortably.

Re: AirPods Pro

#78
post #3

I will personally love to see someone justify spending $250 on wireless earphones whose batteries cannot be replaced. I'm a year and a half into my normal airpods and they already need new batteries.

Why spend $100 on a nice dinner, we'll just have to eat again in 8 hours.

Perhaps there are alternatives that allow you to refill your plate with the original nice dinner for a fraction of the cost of the plate+dinner.

Re: AirPods Pro

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why spend $100 on a nice dinner, we'll just have to eat again in 8 hours.

There used to be an expectation of longevity in the electronics we purchase. Even while Moore's law was in full effect, you could find good uses for a 6 year old computer. Today's computer hardware can easily remain fully usable for a decade. The notion of buying a laptop or phone, let alone headphones, every year is ludicrous and actively harmful to the environment.

You must have lived in a different "Used to be" than I did. I owned multiple Walkman style cassette players back in the 80s and if you got 2 years use out of those foam covered headphones, it was a small miracle. Even buying replacement foam, the cords got snagged and destroyed quickly. Also, the cheap plastic doors on the players were notoriously prone to failing. Not to mention all of them were powered by disposable batteries which powered them for just a few hours and had to be tossed out.

Re: AirPods Pro

#80
I have a pair of AirPods, and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t disappointed with them, the main reason being that they just don’t seem to fit in my ears very well, needing constant readjustment. Further, the sound quality is no better than the pair that comes with the iPhone that can be purchased for $29. I also find the nfc pairing nice, but also frustrating when it fails, and extra annoying when trying to check battery levels. I’ll never understand why the battery level doesn’t show up on the top right like every other Bluetooth headphone set I have.

I do find them pretty convenient at the gym so it’s not all bad.

Perhaps I should have waited for these, but I already have a Bose pair that fits my noise cancelling needs pretty well.

Post reply on HN