Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Stackoverflow getting killed by SEO spam. Google?

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 18 posts

Stackoverflow getting killed by SEO spam. Google?

#1

Post by mmaunder »

Search results snapshot: http://i.imgur.com/9SRoX.png

Spam page: http://efreedom.com/Question/1-1708417/Can-Extract-EXIF-Data-Using-PerlMagick

Scraped verbatim from: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1708417/how-can-i-extract-exif-data-using-perlmagick

Spam site has two entries ranking above two stackoverflow entries.

Here's the search link, although rankings may have changed since I posted this: http://www.google.com/search?hl=&q=perlmagick+remove+exif

I tried various edits, but HN won't turn the URL's into links.

Re: Stackoverflow getting killed by SEO spam. Google?

#4

Post by dangrossman »

The efreedom page contains more mentions of your search phrase "remove exif" than the StackOverflow page, with more links to relevant related questions than SO had. It's the more relevant result.

It's also not spam, all the content they've assembled is completely legally used and well presented. You're not brought to a malicious site or tricked into clicking any ads, you get the questions and answers you were looking for.

Google did its job. There's nothing wrong with that search result page or that site.

Re: Stackoverflow getting killed by SEO spam. Google?

#8

Post by hallmark »

jolan wrote: post #2

"This question and answers originated from stackoverflow.com"; no ads. Not very spammy.

Except that this site breaks the ability for visitors to contribute their own answers [1] and displays content that is often old and out of sync. It does nothing to attempt to improve upon the original site, other than obtaining a better Google ranking - and that is a dubious improvement.

This site is abiding by the letter of the license but not the spirit. Once you start defending this garbage, you let your guard down.

Jeff Atwood's intention with Stack Exchange's data dumps is to make certain (and ensure to its users) that his site will never become evil and hold all the community-contributed content hostage behind a paywall [2]. Although Jeff does not come out and argue against simple reposting of content without any added value, I frankly consider it unwanted spam that fragments a beautiful community.

[1] Unless the visitor notices enough to click the tiny and generic stackoverflow.com link, bringing us back to (hey) the original site.

[2] See http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/defending-attribution-...

Edit: for formatting

Re: Stackoverflow getting killed by SEO spam. Google?

#9

Post by bryanlarsen »

dangrossman wrote: post #4

The efreedom page contains more mentions of your search phrase "remove exif" than the StackOverflow page, with more links to relevant related questions than SO had. It's the more relevant result. It's also not spam, all the content they've assembled is completely legally used and well presented. You're not brought to a malicious site or tricked into clicking any ads, you get the questions and answers you were looking…

Why the downvotes? This is the comment that actually answers the question the poster asked! The fact that you disagree with the statement "It's also not spam" doesn't mean you should downvote, especially when the other 90% of the comment is very informative.

If you disagree, comment, don't downvote.

To restate: the searchfreedom page contains more of the stuff that an algorithm can know is important to a good search ranking like more mentions of the search phrase and more relevant outgoing links. It also contains nothing malicious. The stackoverflow page has some stuff that we consider important, like the ability to comment and by being the authoritative source. But Google cannot take this into consideration because it cannot know -- it's just an algorithm.

Post reply on HN