A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
1–10 of 65 posts
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#2Why can't we have something in-between?
Like, instead of a manager, we have a team assistant. Someone who does burocracy and orga, but hasn't any power and the power is exercied in some way by all of the team members.
This would remove the "if all do it no one does it" problem and still prevent single people decisions.
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#3Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#4People often talk about the extemes. Managers or no managers. Why can't we have something in-between? Like, instead of a manager, we have a team assistant. Someone who does burocracy and orga, but hasn't any power and the power is exercied in some way by all of the team members. This would remove the "if all do it no one does it" problem and still prevent single people decisions.
They are even less useful without power.
Problem is most of the managers are junior in their position. They don't have leadership experience. Often just got a promotion and come up from a different background and only have a few years of experience on management position. Or, they have some experience at different scale. So when they start on a bigger organisation, they are just like junior employees in my opinion.
Proper leadership requires lots of experience and skills.
The way it works best in my experience is the team helping them to work efficiently. If they (managers) are not informed enough, they start micromanaging everyone and everything around them because they feel nothing is aligned or everything is out of control.
Same story when they are misinformed. If the information is negative they panic and start direct communication with every team member. And when it is just false positives, they may look very unaccountable or impulsive.
The best is to inform them before they seek for information and updates. And use their powers to solve team problems. They have power to provide the support or remove impediments.
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#5Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#6People often talk about the extemes. Managers or no managers. Why can't we have something in-between? Like, instead of a manager, we have a team assistant. Someone who does burocracy and orga, but hasn't any power and the power is exercied in some way by all of the team members. This would remove the "if all do it no one does it" problem and still prevent single people decisions.
Mind you - have had awful managers as well - but fortunately not very many and not for a long time.
Edit: I should also add that I've certainly been an awful manager at times....
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#7People often talk about the extemes. Managers or no managers. Why can't we have something in-between? Like, instead of a manager, we have a team assistant. Someone who does burocracy and orga, but hasn't any power and the power is exercied in some way by all of the team members. This would remove the "if all do it no one does it" problem and still prevent single people decisions.
> Someone who does burocracy and orga, but hasn't any power They are even less useful without power. Problem is most of the managers are junior in their position. They don't have leadership experience. Often just got a promotion and come up from a different background and only have a few years of experience on management position. Or, they have some experience at different scale. So when they start on a bigger organi…
If managers are getting things done by wielding their authority from the org chart, odds are they aren't great leaders to begin with.
In most organizations, leaders arise naturally, and they don't always match the org chart. Wise managers let those people shine, and help them succeed. Then the informal leaders help the team succeed, and the manager gets what they want because they did the cliche of hiring smart people and then letting them do what they do best.
In such a scenario, managers may ask what they are doing... because the team is doing it all without much help. But that is a good thing. The manager did their job, of building an effective team.
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#8Why would it be difficult to measure what managers do? Measure the total output of their team. That's it.
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#9"... when it is difficult to measure what managers do, it can be tricky to design incentives to reward them." Why would it be difficult to measure what managers do? Measure the total output of their team. That's it.
Re: A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky
#10But yeah, managers can be useful and/or sneaky. They can also be sleepy, hungry, boring, sociopathic and all of the other things humans can be.