Earlier quoted context omitted.
2k/hr?????
It's basically therapy for corporate executives, delivered via powerpoint, with a healthy side of blame insurance. And yeah, it's expensive.
And all true.
131–140 of 165 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
God, these consulting companies are the _worst_.
What do you expect from a bunch of 24 year-old self-proclaimed "experts" fresh out of Harvard?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's basically therapy for corporate executives, delivered via powerpoint, with a healthy side of blame insurance. And yeah, it's expensive.
This is so true, so much of management consulting is therapy with some generalist strategy and interesting analogies thrown in.
Problems with weak banks are usually solved by merging them with stronger banks. It's the non-bank financial institutions that are more worrisome. Recall that Lehman Brothers and AIG were not banks.
> Recall that Lehman Brothers and AIG were not banks. AIG was an insurance company, yes. But Lehman Brothers was an investment bank. From Wikipedia: > in 2008, Lehman was the fourth-largest investment bank in the United States
Side note: AIG managed to get regulatory treatment as a bank via OTS by having a tiny tiny tiny retail banking operation called AIG Bank. OTS ended up being the primary regulatory of the overall entity!
McKinsey & Accenture could do with some anti trust investigation at this point, they have too much of the outsourced brain work and strategy of important western firms executed in a cookie cutter way that then exploits the inside knowledge for future projects. This banking prediction is an example of this type of thinking. McKinsey are the problem not the solution
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see you are unfamiliar with McKinsey.
Former employee Edit: I cannot reply to the below, but I will say, that’s a pretty contrived justification for your view. Communication is hard. Few things done at a corporate scale are easy to implement. People like to point at big consulting firms and say “I could have done that” or “they could have just asked me” but that’s really just a fraction of it.
I will say though that McKinsey alums I know seem to be better at playing corporate politics than the average, which can be a skill when married with technical acumen.
McKinsey & Accenture could do with some anti trust investigation at this point, they have too much of the outsourced brain work and strategy of important western firms executed in a cookie cutter way that then exploits the inside knowledge for future projects. This banking prediction is an example of this type of thinking. McKinsey are the problem not the solution
Serious question: could you cite some Accenture projects with serious brain work? They are typically in the systems integration category while MBB (McKinsey Bain BCG) get the prestigious work.
Sadly, regular taxpayers will pay the bill. Just like last time.
Once again completing the cycle of moral hazards in the name of reducing the "impact" of rescissions in the short-term. The only metric that apparently matters.
AKA On behalf of our banking customers we're going to be advising that governments get ready to do another bailout.
>do another bailout. I know you're being tongue-in-cheek, but in theory, are governments even capable of doing another bailout? My understanding is that public debt in most Western countries (not sure about China/India) is through the roof. Other than printing money and risking a cataclysmic devaluation, what can be done?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>do another bailout. I know you're being tongue-in-cheek, but in theory, are governments even capable of doing another bailout? My understanding is that public debt in most Western countries (not sure about China/India) is through the roof. Other than printing money and risking a cataclysmic devaluation, what can be done?
I hope it does not come as a surprise if I tell you that printing money has already been, since a long time and in great quantities, taking place. The cataclysmic devaluation part is the one they are working on postponing.