> The attacker gained access to the server — which had been active for about a month — by exploiting an insecure remote management system left by the datacenter provider, which NordVPN said it was unaware that such a system existed. This screams for clarification and I'd love for someone more knowledgeable in the area to elaborate on it. Is this common practice for data-center providers? Do I now not only have to wor…
Sounds like an iDRAC exploit (assuming Dell servers). But, yes, remote management is pretty common in datacenters. The fact that NordVPN wasn't aware of them just shows incompetence.
NordVPN confirms it was hacked
241–250 of 666 posts
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#242This is always topical: Don't use VPN Services https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29
Which is precisely the use case I use a VPN for.
I'd rather trust an at least somewhat trustworthy VPN provider with my data than a random coffee shop and clients who happen to be on the same network at the time.
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#243I can't help but notice that NordVPN is one of the most heavily advertised VPNs from what I've seen (which raises the question, as one researcher pointed out in the article - are they not spending enough money on their security and infrastructure to protect their users?). They are claiming that: "no-one could know about an undisclosed remote management system left by the [data center] provider". Apparently the hacker…
I find NordVPN's marketing reprehensible. Too many claims and broad strokes about the "anonymity" their service can provide. While I certainly would recommend that US consumers use a VPN router to prevent their ISP from selling data, I think NordVPN really overplays the role of changing IP addresses in the age of browser fingerprinting.
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#244Looks like you can side load OpenVPN onto a FireTV. Maybe I'll go the roll my own this time.
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#245Someone is probably going to ask what other HN users recommend as an alternative. Personally, I use Private Internet Access because they're the only provider I've found with a track record of demonstrably not being able to turn your records over to someone asking for them [1]. [1] https://torrentfreak.com/private-internet-access-no-logging-...
I've had fantastic experience with airvpn. They're cheap, fast, reliable, and support all the configuration types you could want. I'm not affiliated with them but I'm surprised nobody here has mentioned them yet. By far the best VPN provider IMO.
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some thoughts: 1. You have to keep two ports locked down. If you can secure your own laptop, you can secure a cloud instance. The cloud instance you're basically just using as a proxy is a lot less important than what's on your phone or computer. 2. Only you are using the system, and you're not logging. Have an issue? Tear it down and start another. Automated scripts out there generate unique keys every time. 3. A co…
> You have to keep two ports locked down That's what NordVPN thought as well
Launching a personal-use ephemeral cloud instance running OpenVPN to hide your personal traffic from your ISP is absolutely nowhere the same as running a paid VPN service for millions of users across the world.
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#247This is so well timed, I just bought a 3-year subscription to NordVPN and they have a 30 day refund policy.
You should probably ask for a refund, then set up your own VPN. Commerical VPNs are, for the vast majority of cases, simply not a good bet for your privacy. You're changing your network traffic path from a diffuse and byzantine series of paths to once centralized collection point. The payoff for an attack on a VPN rises very quickly. Meanwhile, you're also conditioning yourself to say, "My traffic is secure while my…
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#248I can't help but notice that NordVPN is one of the most heavily advertised VPNs from what I've seen (which raises the question, as one researcher pointed out in the article - are they not spending enough money on their security and infrastructure to protect their users?). They are claiming that: "no-one could know about an undisclosed remote management system left by the [data center] provider". Apparently the hacker…
I find NordVPN's marketing reprehensible. Too many claims and broad strokes about the "anonymity" their service can provide. While I certainly would recommend that US consumers use a VPN router to prevent their ISP from selling data, I think NordVPN really overplays the role of changing IP addresses in the age of browser fingerprinting.
I wouldn't. Much of the web is moving over to https, VPNs are hit-or-miss on whether they route DNS requests, and having to deal with blocked websites because of abuse isn't worth it. That, and you're trusting the VPN to not sell your data.
> browser fingerprinting
I mean...your IP address changes on cell networks all the time. Browser fingerprinting is still an arms race, but if you're actually concerned about something, either do whatever Torbrowser does or use the most popular iPhone.
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair, they can't actually see more than hostnames & IP addresses (assuming the use of TLS, which is becoming ubiquitous), so implying that they sell your "Internet history" makes it sound worse than it is. I've always assumed VPN providers sell whatever data they can too.
I’m not a network expert, but doesn’t TLS just cover your connection with a specific website? Since your IPS is often also your DNS, can’t they still see which specific websites you’re trying to connect to? Wouldn’t TLS just obfuscate what you’re specifically sending to and receiving from that site? I’m under the impression that my ISP can (and probably does) see every website I visit, which is in the least browsing…
Re: NordVPN confirms it was hacked
#250This is always topical: Don't use VPN Services https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29
> Because a VPN in this sense is just a glorified proxy. The VPN provider can see all your traffic, and do with it what they want - including logging. So can my ISP and they have been confirmed to sell customer data and work directly with NSA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/oct/25/att-secretl...